Recent studies using qualitative analysis of flow cytometry data have demonstrated various immunophenotypic abnormalities associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there are limited reports assessing the ability of quantitative immunophenotypic analysis to discriminate MDS from other cytopenic conditions.
Using flow cytometry, we studied 37 bone marrow specimens from 23 patients with MDS and 14 cytopenic patients with non-clonal hematologic disorders. Samples were analyzed quantitatively for percentages of T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, granulocytes, monocytes, blasts, erythroid precursors, and plasma cells; CD4:CD8 ratio; % granulocyte subsets; % CD56+ monocytes; and % erythroid precursor subsets.
Quantitative analysis of immunophenotypic data in MDS patients compared to controls showed decreases in total granulocytes (p=0.037) and more mature subsets of CD11b+CD16bright granulocytes (p=0.0046) and CD10+ granulocytes (p=0.022). MDS patients also showed a trending increase in subset percentage of CD56+monocytes (p=0.056). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, cut-off values for these parameters favoring a diagnosis of MDS were identified as follows: total granulocytes < 60%, CD11b+CD16bright granulocytic subset < 40%, CD10+ granulocytic subset < 40%, and CD56+ monocytic subset > 10%. Subsequently, a scoring system was proposed whereby a score of one was assigned for the presence of each quantitative abnormality. Using this system on the original study population, the presence of at least two abnormalities (score2) revealed optimal sensitivity (69.6%) and specificity (71.4%) for a diagnosis of MDS.Quantitative analysis of immunophenotypic data in MDS patients compared to controls showed decreases in total granulocytes (p=0.037) and more mature subsets of CD11b+CD16bright granulocytes (p=0.0046) and CD10+ granulocytes (p=0.022). MDS patients also showed a trending increase in subset percentage of CD56+monocytes (p=0.056). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, cut-off values for these parameters favoring a diagnosis of MDS were identified as follows: total granulocytes < 60%, CD11b+CD16bright granulocytic subset < 40%, CD10+ granulocytic subset < 40%, and CD56+ monocytic subset > 10%. Subsequently, a scoring system was proposed whereby a score of one was assigned for the presence of each quantitative abnormality. Using this system on the original study population, the presence of at least two abnormalities (score≥2) revealed optimal sensitivity (69.6%) and specificity (71.4%) for a diagnosis of MDS.
These findings suggest that quantitative analysis of immunophenotypic data can be complementary to qualitative interpretation. These data may be useful for distinguishing MDS from non-clonal cytopenic disorders and warrant prospective study in additional MDS patients.
"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."
"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."
"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."
"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."
"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."
"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."
"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."
"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."
"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."
"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."
"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."
"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."
"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."
"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."
"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."
"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."
"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."
"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."
"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."
"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."