RESEARCH ARTICLE
Ultrasound-Guided Sciatic Nerve Block in Below Knee Amputation Surgery: Sub Gluteal Versus Popliteal Approach
Rania Maher Hussien*, Dalia Ahmed Ibrahim, Islam Gamal Hamed Abdelnaby
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2018Volume: 12
First Page: 19
Last Page: 25
Publisher ID: TOATJ-12-19
DOI: 10.2174/2589645801812010019
Article History:
Received Date: 22/01/2018Revision Received Date: 21/05/2018
Acceptance Date: 14/06/2018
Electronic publication date: 16/07/2018
Collection year: 2018
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background:
Ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block has been proved to be effective in pain control for lower limb surgeries, fortunately, it can be performed at different levels via different approaches.
Aims:
To compare the effectiveness of the sub-gluteal and the popliteal approaches of blocking the sciatic nerve as well as their success rate.
Settings and Design:
After approval of the ethical committee and obtaining a written informed consent from 56 ASA II, III patients aged 45–75 year, this prospective, randomized, interventional double blinded study was done to patients undergoing elective below knee amputation.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either sciatic nerve block using a popliteal approach (group P, n 28) or a sub gluteal approach (group G, n 28) femoral nerve block done for sensory block of the medial side of the leg. Time to complete sensory and motor block, time taken to perform the block, block-related complications, block duration, time for asking to rescue analgesia in the first 24 h and both patients′ and surgeons′ level of satisfaction were recorded. Success of the block was considered when the block is solid and doesn’t require shifting to GA.
Result:
Patients in the P group had a 100% success rate, shorter time to perform the block, less overall complications, and required no postoperative rescue analgesia. Yet, more surgeons preferred the sub-gluteal approach.
Conclusion:
Popliteal approach is as effective as the sub-gluteal approach block providing adequate analgesia with a 100% success rate
