RESEARCH ARTICLE


Early Results of Combined and Staged Coronary Bypass and Carotid Endarterectomy in Advanced Age Patients in Single Centre



Hikmet Iyem1, *, Suat Buket2
1 Dicle University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Diyarbakir, Turkey
2 Kent Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Izmir, Turkey


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
13
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1639
Abstract HTML Views: 687
PDF Downloads: 332
Total Views/Downloads: 2658
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 678
Abstract HTML Views: 420
PDF Downloads: 248
Total Views/Downloads: 1346



Creative Commons License
© Iyem and Buket; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Dicle Universitesi, Tip Fakultesi Kalp Damar Cerrahisi AD, Diyarbakir, Turkey; Tel: +90 412 248 80 01; Fax: +90 412 248 80 12; E-mail: hikmetiyem@gmail.com


Abstract

Aim:

In present study, we aimed to compare the staged and combined surgery in patients with severe carotid stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis and detect the factors affecting mortality and morbidity.

Material and method:

Between 2004 and 2008, 120 patients with predominant ischemic heart disease were enrolled to study. Patients were divided into three groups on basis surgery procedure. Group 1 (n=40) includeed patients had coronary artery disease without carotid disease underwent coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) operation. Group 2 (n=40): included patients underwent combined surgery procedure including CABG and carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients underwent staged CABG and CEA were enrolled to Group 3 (n=40). All patients were in advanced aged and were had the same risk factors atributable atherosclerosis

Results:

Mean age of the patients in all groups were 68±6, 69±3, 71±2 respectively, and 83% were male. Eight patients died in all groups at follow-up(seven in group 2 and 3, and one in group 1) and the difference between both groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). The follow-up period in the intensive care unit, and hospitalization period were not statistically different between CABG group and combined CEA plus CABG group.

Conclusion:

We think that the results of staged or combined CABG plus CEA surgery are satisfactory in patients with severe carotid disease and advanced coronary artery disease. However, the mortality and morbidity in both procedures are higher than those of alone.