The Open Dentistry Journal




ISSN: 1874-2106 ― Volume 13, 2019
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of MIM Technology Brackets with Conventional and Rail-Shaped Mesh Bases: An In Vitro Study



Francisco Molina1, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas2, 3, *, Maria Cristina Rockenbach Binz Ordóñez4, Emerson Flamarion Cruz5, Rafael Pinelli Henriques6, Guillermo Mauricio Aguirre Balseca4
1 Department of Orthodontics, FACOP, Bauru, SP, Brazil
2 Department of Orthodontics, Uninga University Center, Maringa, PR, Brazil
3 Department of Orthodontics, FACOP, Bauru, SP, Brazil
4 Facultad de Odontologia, Universidade dos Hemisférios, Quito, Ecuador
5 Department of Finance, FACOP, Bauru, SP, Brazil
6 Department of Foreign Student Care, FACOP, Bauru, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate in vitro the shear bond strength of two types of MIM (Metal Injection Molding) technology brackets, one with conventional mesh base and the other with rail-shaped mesh base.

Materials and Methods:

Forty human premolars received the bonding of 2 types of brackets: Group 1- 20 Synergy metal brackets (Rocky Mountain) with conventional mesh base and Group 2-20 H4 brackets (OrthoClassic) with rail-shaped mesh base. Both brackets were bonded with Resilience photopolymerizable resin (OrthoTechnology). The specimens were coupled to a Tinius Olsen universal test machine where the shear test was performed using a chisel. In addition, the amount of remaining resin in tooth crown with the ImageJ program was evaluated and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Intergroup comparison was performed by the independent t test and Chi-square test.

Results:

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for any of the measures evaluated indicating that the mesh type of the brackets’ base with MIM technology did not influence the shear bond strength of the brackets (shear bond strength, p=0.191; maximum load registered, p=0.244). There was also no difference between the percentage (p=0.602) and area of remaining resin in the teeth (p=0.805) and IRA (p=0.625) between the Synergy and H4 groups.

Conclusion:

Shear bond strength was similar in the two types of brackets with MIM technology evaluated. In addition, the remaining resin in the dental enamel of two types of brackets were also similar.

Keywords: Orthodontic, Bonding, Shear bond strength, Bracket, Conventional mesh base, Rail-shaped mesh base.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2019
Volume: 13
First Page: 255
Last Page: 260
Publisher Id: TODENTJ-13-255
DOI: 10.2174/1874210601913010255

Article History:

Received Date: 24/04/2019
Revision Received Date: 11/06/2019
Acceptance Date: 15/07/2019
Electronic publication date: 31/07/2019
Collection year: 2019

Article Metrics:

CrossRef Citations:
0

Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 245
Abstract HTML Views: 161
PDF Downloads: 86
ePub Downloads: 74
Total Views/Downloads: 566

Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 160
Abstract HTML Views: 106
PDF Downloads: 66
ePub Downloads: 57
Total Views/Downloads: 389
Geographical View

© 2019 Molina et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Orthodontics, UNINGA University Center Rod PR 317, 6114 CEP 87035-510 Maringá-PR-Brazil; Tel: 55 14 991026446; E-mail: kmsf@uol.com.br


Endorsements



"Thank you for your magnificent and marvelous support throughout the publication stages. I would like to endorse my experience with you as a Junior Researcher and a recent graduate of the Dental school. Once again Thank you for your Great Help and Guidance throughout the stages of Publication. You guys are a great team and I am proud to be a Young Bentham author."


Asra Sabir Hussain
The University of Edinburgh Business School, UK

"My experience with Bentham Open was a valuable one because the quality of the services and analysis of my paper contributed in improving what we intended to convey to the readers."


José Ricardo Kina
Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic,
Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University
Brazil

"The Publication Manager was very cooperative and replied my mails and guided me without any delays; however the reviewing process was too long."


Mahtab Memarpour
Prevention of Oral and Dental Disease Research Center,
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry,
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz,
Iran


Browse Contents



Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.net
Copyright © 2019 Bentham Open