RESEARCH ARTICLE


How Many Principles for Public Health Ethics?



Steven S. Coughlin *
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Atlanta, GA, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
34
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 238
Abstract HTML Views: 1255
PDF Downloads: 896
Total Views/Downloads: 2389
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 137
Abstract HTML Views: 780
PDF Downloads: 709
Total Views/Downloads: 1626



Creative Commons License
Coughlin et al.; Licensee Bentham Open

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30341; Tel: (770) 488-4776; Fax: (770) 488-4639; E-mails: sic9@cdc.gov


Abstract

General moral (ethical) principles play a prominent role in certain methods of moral reasoning and ethical decision- making in bioethics and public health. Examples include the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Some accounts of ethics in public health have pointed to additional principles related to social and environmental concerns, such as the precautionary principle and principles of solidarity or social cohesion. This article provides an overview of principle-based methods of moral reasoning as they apply to public health ethics including a summary of advantages and disadvantages of methods of moral reasoning that rely upon general principles of moral reasoning. Drawing upon the literature on public health ethics, examples are provided of additional principles, obligations, and rules that may be useful for analyzing complex ethical issues in public health. A framework is outlined that takes into consideration the interplay of ethical principles and rules at individual, community, national, and global levels. Concepts such as the precautionary principle and solidarity are shown to be useful to public health ethics to the extent that they can be shown to provide worthwhile guidance and information above and beyond principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, and the clusters of rules and maxims that are linked to these moral principles. Future directions likely to be productive include further work on areas of public health ethics such as public trust, community empowerment, the rights of individuals who are targeted (or not targeted) by public health interventions, individual and community resilience and wellbeing, and further clarification of principles, obligations, and rules in public health disciplines such as environmental science, prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, genomics, and global health.