Table 2: Mean statistical data of CAD cancer detection rates in percent from search study results.

Study/ Author Zone/ Area of Interest Sensitivity Specificity Gleason Score>6 Sensitivity Gleason Score>6 Specificity DICE Similarity Coefficient/ Accuracy
Greer et al. PZ & TZ 86.3% 57.1% - - -
Dinh et al. PZ 95.0% - - - -
Thon et al. - 46.8% 75.4% - - -
Giannini V. et al. 2017 - 94.3 % 87.6% 91.3% 87.6% -
Gao G. et al. 2017
Rida I. et al. 2017
PZ & TZ 81.8%
83.3%
94.5%
100%
-
-
-
-
92.3%
-
Giannini V. et al. 2015 PZ 84.0% 86.0% - - -
Citak-Er F, et al. 2014 - 86.5% 87.9% - - -
To, MNN, et al. 2018 - - - - - 95.1%
Tian et al. 2018 - - - - - 85.3%
Li J, et al. 2018 Dataset 1 PZ, CG 95.2% 100% - - 97.6%
Li J, et al. 2018 Dataset 2 PZ, CG 90.3% 92.2% - - 89.7%
Iyama. Dataset 1 PZ, TZ 90.0% 60-90% ¤ - - -
Iyama. Dataset 2 PZ, TZ 82.0% 95.3% - - -
Zhu Y, et al. 2017 - 91.5% 88.5% - - -
Tian Z. 2017
Merisaari (SVM)
-
-
-
93.0%
-
91.7%
-
-
-
-
87.2%
-
Merisaari (LR) - 86.7% 77.2% - - -
Guo Y. et al. 2014 - - - - - 90.1%
Stember JN, et al. 2014 - 84.4% 78.1% - - -

¤Table II key: Peripheral zone=PZ, Transitional zone=TZ, Central gland=CG.