Table 5: Mean trait response for the seedbed effect averaged across cultivars and six environments [Fargo (undrained), Fargo (drained), Prosper, Barnesville, Hitterdal, and Rothsay] in 2012.

Seedbed SC EV LV IDC CC PH TKW GY PC OC
  plants ha-1 ----1-9§---- 1-5 % cm --g-- kg ha-1 ----g kg-1----
Flat 314 894 6.2 7.3 1.58 68 77 130.8 3 038 308 185
Raised 302 774 6.2 7.4 1.44 68 76 131.5 2 999 307 185
LSD (0.05) ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
                     
Seedbed LP 1S 2S 3S 4S TS TP SP    
  mm --------------------------------------number------------------------------------    
Flat 116 3 11.3 15.1 0.4 72.5 29.8 2.4    
Raised 114 3.3 12.1 16.8 0.5 80 32.7 2.42    
LSD (0.05) ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns    

ns = not significant.
SC = stand count, EV = early vigor (28 June to 29 June), LV = late vigor (20 Aug. to 21 Aug.), IDC = iron deficiency chlorosis score, CC = canopy closure (at R6), PH = plant height, TKW = thousand kernel weight, GY = grain yield, PC = protein content, OC = oil content, LP = lowest pod height, 1S to 4S = number of pods per plant with one to four seeds, TS = total seeds per plant, TP = total pods per plant, SP = average seeds per pod.
IDC is averaged over five environments due to no visual IDC differences at Prosper.
§Based on a visual score, with 9 being the most vigorous.
Based on the visual scale from Goos and Johnson (2008), with 5 being most chlorotic.