Table 1: Good Features and Limitations/Shortfalls of the Spinal Systems used by the Respondents (Question 3)

Spinal System Used Good Features Limitations & Shortfalls
PediGuard® (SpineGuard S.A., St Mandé, France) Likened as a pedicle screw "parktroni" system Noisy
Easy to use Different feel to normal pedicle finder
Sensitivity problems
Expensive
Delicate
Slightly short probe
C-Arm X-ray
Image Intensifier
Quick X-ray dose to patient and surgical team
Available at all hospitals Difficult with scoliosis
Good visualisation. Need to move image intensifier
Helps with ideal placement & most appropriate angles in the lumbar/thoracic spine Does not provide a 3D image; risk of encroaching on the spinal canal
Easily adjustable Difficult with small pedicles
Portable Occasional image quality problems
Inexperienced staff
Learning curve for junior staff
Touch/feel Increased certainty of placement Does not provide 100% certainty
Special probe designed
by a surgeon 20 years ago
Safe method
Inexpensive
Not good for porotic bone
Mehdian™
pedicle screw system (Corin Group PLC, Cirencester, UK)
Simple
Easy to use
The StealthStation® iNAV™ (Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, Colorado, USA) Accurate Increased surgery time
Provides security Heavy reliance on imaging
PRAXIM Medivision navigation system (PRAXIM Medivision SA, Grenoble, France) Provides 3D images Long set-up and training time
Accurate Bulky
Complex equipment; prone to breaking down
BrainLAB VectorVision® Spine (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany) Easy to use No real-time pictures
Cannulated screws (Ulrich GmbH & Co.KG, Ulm, Germany) Easy to insert using a guide wire