No. | Researchers | Depth of Installation (m) | Sand Mat Thickness (mm) | Patterns Installation |
Installation Distance (m) |
Mandrel | Height of Embankment (m) |
Speed of Installation (mm/s) |
Type of Soil |
Field Data Back-Calculation |
s’=rs/rm or s= rs/rw* |
κ= kh/ks | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shape |
Dimension (mm2) |
||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
1 | Bergado et al. (1991) [6] | 8.0 | 1,000 | Square | 1.2 | Rectangular | 45 x150, 150 x150 |
Soft Clay, Bangkok | Analytical | 2.0 | kh= kv | ||
2 | Bergado et al. (1992) [7] | 8.0 | 300 | Triangle | 1.5 | Rectangular | 150 x 45 | 4.00 | - | Soft Clay, Bangkok | Analytical | 2.5 * | 10.0 |
3 | Bergado et al. (2000) [8] | 12.0 | 1,500 | Square | 1.0; 1.2; 1.5 | Rectangular | - | 4.20 | - | Soft Clay, Bangkok | Analytical | 2.0 | 5.0 |
4 | Saowapakpiboonet et al. (2010) [9] | 10.0 | - | Triangle | 0.85 | Rectangular | - | - | - | Soft Clay, Bangkok Soft Clay, Bangkok | Analytical Analytical |
2.0 2.0 |
7.2 6.6 (+v) |
5 | Hiep and Chung (2018) [10] |
30.0 – 35.0 | 500 - 800 | Triangle | 1.5 | Rectangular | 120 x 80 | 6.00 - 8.00 | - | Clay, Mekong Delta | Analytical | 2.0 | 2.0 |
6 | Indraratna and Redana (2000) [11] | 12.0 18.0 |
1,500 - |
Square Triangle |
1; 1.2; 1.5 1.3 |
Rectangular Rectangular |
- - |
4.20 - |
- - |
Soft Clay, Bangkok Muar Clay Deposit | FEM FEM |
4-5 * 4-5 * |
kh = kv kh = kv |
7 | Chai and Miura (1999) [12] |
25.0 | 500 | Square | 1.5 | Rectangular | - | 3.50 | - | Soft Clay, Ariake | FEM | 3.0 | 10.0 |
8 | Chai et al. (1995) [13] | 18.0 | - | Triangle | 1.2 | Rectangular | - | 4.70 | - | Muar Clay Deposit | FEM | 4.2 * | 2.0 |
9 | Chai et al. (1996) [14] | 18.0 12.0 |
- - |
Triangle Square |
1.2 1.5 |
Rectangular Rectangular |
- 120 x 60 |
4.70 - |
- - |
Muar Clay Deposit Soft Clay, Bangkok |
FEM FEM |
3.0 3.0 |
10.0 10.0 |
10 | Chai et al. (2001) [15] | 19.0 | 500 | Triangle | 1.5 | Rectangular | - | - | - | Mucky Clay | FEM | 6.7 * | 13.8 |
11 | Indraratna et al. (2008) [16] |
12.0 | - | Triangle | 1.5 | Rectangular | - | 1.50 | - | Soft Clay, Swedish | FEM | 2.0 * | 4.0 |
12 | Pajouh et al. (2013) [17] | 9.0 | - | Square | 1.0 | Rectangular | - | 3.00 | - | Soft Clay, Chittagong | FEM | 3.0 | 2.0 |
13 | Pajouh et al.(2014) [18] | 11.0 9.0 |
650 - |
Triangle Square |
2.0 1.0 |
Rectangular Rectangular |
- - |
2.85 3.00 |
- - |
Silty Clay Soft Clay, Chittagong |
FEM FEM |
3.0 3.0 |
4.0 2.0 |
14 | Pajouh et al.(2014) [19] | 24.0 22.0 11.00 |
1,500 650 650 |
Square Triangle Triangle |
1.0 1.35 2.0 |
Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular |
- - - |
8.50 5.00 2.80 |
- - - |
Soft Clay, Ballina Soft Soil Silty Clay |
FEM FEM FEM |
4.0 5.0 3.0 |
4.0 5.0 4.0 |
15 | Bo et al. (2003) [20] | 50.0 | Square | 2.2, 5.3 | Rectangular Rhombus |
120 x 60, 145 x 90 |
300 - 600 300 - 600 |
Marine Clay, Singapore | Field and Laboratory Test | 4.0-7.0 | 2.0-10.0 | ||
16 | The Case study | 17.0 | 600 | Triangle | 1.5 | Rectangular | 120 x 50 | 5.20 | 400 - 500 | Soft Soil, North Sumatra | Analytical | 3.0 | 7.0 |