Table 2: Mean differences between mesiodistal angles of conventional pan and CBCT pan-like images (n = 40).
Tooth Number*
|
Mean Difference (˚) |
SD
|
95% CI for Difference
|
p-value
|
Bonferroni p-value
|
|
16 |
-3.2 |
3.9 |
-5.832, -.568 |
.017 |
.408 |
|
15 |
-0.4 |
4.8 |
-3.017, 2.247 |
.774 |
1.00 |
|
14 |
+0.4 |
5.4 |
-2.268, 3.035 |
.777 |
1.00 |
|
13 |
+.09 |
4.6 |
-1.734, 3.529 |
.503 |
1.00 |
|
12 |
+2.4 |
9.3 |
-.222, 5.042 |
.073 |
1.00 |
|
11 |
+0.9 |
6.9 |
-1.684, 3.579 |
.480 |
1.00 |
|
21 |
+2.7 |
6.0 |
.068, 5.332 |
.044 |
1.00 |
|
22 |
+4.1 |
7.9 |
1.431, 6.694 |
.003 |
.072 |
|
23 ** |
+5.1 |
5.8 |
2.250, 7.555 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
24 |
+0.6 |
4.9 |
-2.049, 3.257 |
.655 |
1.00 |
|
25 |
-0.8 |
5.1 |
-3.374, 1.932 |
.594 |
1.00 |
|
26 |
-2.5 |
5.2 |
-5.147, .117 |
.061 |
1.00 |
|
36 ** |
-4.7 |
6.6 |
-7.317, -2.053 |
.001 |
.024 |
|
35 |
-0.7 |
5.5 |
-3.312, 1.952 |
.612 |
1.00 |
|
34 ** |
+5.6 |
8.8 |
2.948, 8.212 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
33 ** |
+8.3 |
11.6 |
5.621, 10.884 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
32 ** |
+8.9 |
16.1 |
6.261, 11.524 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
31 |
+1.9 |
14.3 |
-.722, 4.542 |
.155 |
1.00 |
|
41 ** |
+6.4 |
11.6 |
3.761, 9.024 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
42 ** |
+8.0 |
13.0 |
5.336, 10.599 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
43 ** |
+7.2 |
9.9 |
4.548, 9.812 |
.000 |
.000 |
|
44 ** |
+4.1 |
7.9 |
1.501, 6.764 |
.002 |
.048 |
|
45 |
+.3 |
5.8 |
-2.397, 2.907 |
.850 |
1.00 |
|
46 |
-3.7 |
6.3 |
-6.199, -.894 |
.009 |
.216 |
* FDI tooth numbers.
Mean difference = (CBCT mesiodistal angle) - (standard pano mesiodistal angle) P < .05 is considered statistically significant.
** Indicates teeth measurements remain statistically significantly different after Bonferroni p-value adjustment.