| Date of Publication | Authors Name | Study Type | Number of Patients with OLP & Dental Implants | Total Number of Implants | Failure Rate | Age of Patient | Type of Disease | (Mean) Follow up (months) | Type of Implant Supported Prosthetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Lopez-Jornet et al. |
Cross sectional | 10 female 6 male |
56 | n.a | Range 44-76 64.5(Mean) |
OLP | Range 12-120 42 (Mean) |
3 over dentures 13 fixed partial prosthetic |
| 2006 | Reichart et al. | Report of 3 cases | 3 female | 10 | 0% | 63,68,79 70(Mean) |
OLP | 156(n=4), 36(n=2), n.a.(n=4 implant) | Fixed partial prosthetic |
| 2012 | Hernandez et al. |
Prospective-controlled study | 14 female 4 male |
56 | 0% | 53.5 (Mean) | OLP | 53.5 months | Fixed partial prosthetic |
| 2003 | Eposito et al. | clinical report | 2 female | 4 | 0% | 72/78 | OLP | 21 months | Over denture |
| 2008 | Gallego et al. | case report | 1 female | 2 | 100% | 81 | OLP | 36 months | Over denture |
| 2006 | Czerninski et al. |
case report | 1 female | 3 | 100% | 52 | OLP | 36 months | Fixed prosthetic |
| 2013 | Czerninski et al. |
retrospective controlled study | 11 female 3 male |
54 | 0% | 59.5 (Mean) | OLP | 63 months | Fixed partial prosthetic |
| 2000 | Esposito et al. | case report | 1 female | 2 | 100% | 69 | OLP | 32 months 60 months |
Over denture |
| 2005 | Oczakir et al. | case report | 1 female | 4 | 0% | 74 | OLP | 72 months | Fixed prosthetic |
| 2012 | Portela Tejedor | literature review in related to 3clinical cases | 2 female 1 male |
8 | n.a. | 53,59,59 | OLP | n.a. | Fixed prosthetic (third case awaiting rehabilitation) |
| 2013 | Altin et al. | Clinicl report | 1 female | 2 | n.a. | 70 | PV | 32 months | Over denture |
| 2010 | Ergun et al. | case report & literature review | 1 female | 6 | n.a. | 49 | SLE | 24 months | Fixed prosthetic |