Table 2: Implants performance under static and dynamic loading conditions.

  Imp.
No.
Effective leakage
(hPa/min)
Water Volume
before (ml)
Time of Bac.
Leakage (day)
Influence on leakage After Dyn. Loading
(hPa/min)
Water Volume
after (ml)
Group A 1 0.004 0.000 No leakage -0.017 0.000
2 0.002 0.000 No leakage 0.001 0.000
3 0.068 0.042 No leakage -0.066 0.000
4 0.004 0.000 No leakage 0.003 0.000
5 5.531 2.500 1 -4.900 0.258
6 5.53 2.500 1 0.000 2.500
7 0.189 0.096 1 -0.030 0.000
8 5.503 2.500 1 -5.325 0.089
*9 0.025 0.000 No leakage 0.002 0.000
*10 0.027 0.000 No leakage -0.002 0.000
Group B 1 0.008 0.000 No leakage 0.010 0.000
2 0.009 0.000 No leakage 0.016 0.000
3 0.026 0.000 No leakage 0.014 0.000
4 0.008 0.000 No leakage 0.008 0.000
5 0.020 0.000 No leakage 0.010 0.000
6 0.014 0.000 No leakage 0.030 0.000
7 0.004 0.000 No leakage -0.005 0.000
8 0.008 0.000 No leakage -0.007 0.000
*9 0.002 0.000 No leakage 0.001 0.000
*10 0.016 0.000 No leakage -0.003 0.000
Group C 1 0.048 0.036 1 5.463 2.500
2 0.007 0.000 No leakage 0.025 0.000
3 0.338 0.161 2 -0.300 0.000
4 0.005 0.000 2 5.509 2.500
5 5.531 2.500 1 0.000 2.500
6 0.042 0.026 No leakage -0.018 0.000
7 0.151 0.076 1 0.014 0.073
8   2.500 1 0.000 2.500
*9 0.013 0.000 No leakage -0.002 0.000
*10 0.001 0.000 No leakage -0.001 0.000

Table 2: Detailed implant test performance. * Implants served as negative controls

Back to Article