Table 1: Results of applying the proposed environmental sustainability framework to the KASP.

Issues of Coastal Environmental Sustainability Environmental Sustainability Factors (-4) Very High Negative (-3) High Negative (-2) Average Negative (-1) Low Negative (+1) Low Positive (+2) Average Positive (+3) High Positive (+4) Very High Positive Ecological Footprint
a. Maintenance of natural processes 1. Wave action - -3 - - - - - - -
2. Tidal activity - - - -1 - - - - -
3. Coast development - - -2 - - - - - -
4. Coast protection - - - -1 - - - - -
b. Enhancement of biodiversity 1. Flora -4 - - - - - - - -
2. Fauna - - -2 - - - - - -
3. Successional process -4 - - - - - - - -
c. Site productivity 1. Marine products - - -2 - - - - - -
2. Quality of marine products - - -2 - - - - - -
3. Terrestrial productivity -4 - - - - - - - -
4. Quality of terrestrial products -4 - - - - - - - -
d. Continuous use of the site 1. Day/night - - - - - +2 - - -
2. Carrying capacity - - - - - +2 - - -
3. Summer/winter - - - - - +2 - - -
4. Carrying capacity - - - - +1 - - - -
e. Design and used materials 1. Perceptions of users to environment - - - - - - +3 - -
2. Durability of design and materials - - - -1 - - - - -
3. Waste and Pollution generated - - -2 - - - - - -
4. General appearance - - - -1 - - - - -
5. Maintenance cost - -3 - - - - - - -
6. Health and ecological protection - - -2 - - - - - -
7. Microclimate modification - - - -1 - - - - -
Accumulated impacts of related indicators -16 -6 -12 -5 +1 +6 +3 0 (-29) Negative ecological footprint
Total accumulated EF of all indicators