Table 3: Performance comparison with other relevant and recent LNAs.
|
Year |
CMOS technology (nm) |
-3dB BW (GHz) |
Voltage gain (dB) |
NF (dB) |
Power consumption (mW) |
IIP3 (dBm) |
Supply voltage (V) |
Interferer rejection (dB) |
Tuning range (GHz) |
[This work]s
|
|
180 |
4.75 – 7.5 |
14 |
3.1 |
5.22 |
-13.75 |
1.2 |
23.5 - 40 |
5.17 – 5.785 |
[3] |
2000 |
240 |
5 |
18 |
4.8 |
7.2 |
-2 |
2 |
12 |
N.A. |
[4]s
|
2006 |
180 |
5 |
16.45 |
2.66 |
15.46 |
N.A. |
1.8 |
16 - 36 |
3.3 – 4.15 |
[5]s
|
2006 |
180 |
2.4 |
27 |
2.2 |
20 |
N.A. |
N.A. |
28 |
1.08 – 1.14 |
[12] |
2010 |
180 |
3.1 – 10.6 |
13.2 |
4.5 |
23 |
-1.4 |
1.8 |
8.2 |
5 - 6 |
[13] |
2012 |
130 |
0.925 – 0.96 |
15.1 |
3.5 |
24.72 |
-3.4 |
1.2 |
37 |
0.88 - 0.915 |
[14] |
2016 |
180 |
3 - 5 |
15.3 |
4 |
9.1 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
29.2 |
2.2 – 2.7 |
[15]s
|
2016 |
180 |
0.8 – 1.7 |
17.5 |
3.4 |
8.96 |
7.36 |
1.8 |
N.A. |
0.84 – 1.66 |
[16]s
|
2016 |
180 |
2.6 |
34.2 |
1.25 |
23.85 |
4.52 |
1.8 |
7.5 |
N.A. |
s means simulation only |