Table 3: Data quality dimensions and their related characteristics in the reviewed papers.

Article Characteristic Dimension
Dawson et al. (26), Nagurney et al. (30), Hunt et al., (37), Kanegaye et al. (50), Morphet et al. (38), Considine et al . (34), Smith et al. (42), Dalawari et al. (51) Completeness Completeness (16 articles)
Porter et al. (7), Ward et al. (28); Abuyassin et al. (54), Ward et al. (48) Missing data/omission
Stiell et al. (39), Cwinn et al. (35), Remen and Grimsmo (47) Information gaps
Porter et al. (7) Validity (accurate and complete ) Accuracy (13 articles)
Porter et al. (46) False positive and negative,
True positive
Brice et al. (33), Hunt et al. (37), Hu et al. (52), Liaw et al. (59) Exact matching /agreement
Porter et al. (7) Over-reporting , under-reporting
Ward et al. (28) Accuracy
Abuyassin et al. (54) Commission
Dawson et al. (26), Ward et al. (48) Inaccurate/error
Hu et al. (52) Reliability
Nagurney et al. (30), Sunderman et al. (43), Jones et al. (32), Porter et al. (46) Sensitivity
Nagurney et al. (30), Jones et al. (32), Porter et al. (46) Specificity
Jones et al. (32) Added value
Aronsky and Haug (25), Mckenzie et al. (27), Liaw et al. (59) Concordance Consistency (9 articles)
Downing et al. (40), Gorelick et al., (36), Mears et al. (41), Brice et al. (33), Hu et al. (52) Linkage data Agreement
Hunt et al. (37) Exact matching
Aronsky and Haug (25), Gorelick et al. (45), Ward et al. (48) Availability Accessibility (4 articles)
Hripcsak et al. (57) Accessibility
Ward et al. (28), Ward et al. (48), Travers et al. (49) Timeliness Timeliness (3 articles)