| Items | % of positive responses from CHNs (n = 17) |
|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with the use of the IWSS - Compared to presentation of the IWSS that was made to you, were you satisfied with the use of the technology? - How would you evaluate the usefulness of the IWSS? Did it help you? - In your opinion, did the IWSS become an indispensable part of your daily activity? |
6% (n = 1)6% (n = 1)(n = 0)* |
|
Installation of the IWSS - Was the length of the assessment period prior to the installation of IWSS acceptable? - Concerning the previous interview, was the content of the previous interview acceptable? - Was that the duration of sensor placement acceptable? - Was setting the alert indicators easy to do? |
50% (n = 8) 31% (n = 5) 50% (n = 8) 59% (n = 10) |
|
Adherence - Did you have difficulty understanding how to use the IWSS’s software? - Could you integrate data from the IWSS into your patients’ care management? |
59% (n = 10) 6% (n = 1) |
|
Credibility – Ease of use – Safety - Was the IWSS interface easy to use? - Was the IWSS a reliable and appropriate one with which to ensure the safety of home-dwelling older patients? - Were the alert messages useful for adapting your patients’ care? - Was the IWSS better than you expected? - Was the IWSS easy to integrate with other technologies used in your daily practice? - The IWSS did not overload daily planned care and nursing activities? - Did the IWSS provide you with useful information that is otherwise inaccessible? |
29% (n = 5) 18% (n = 3) 0% (n = 0)* 0% (n = 0)* 6% (n = 1) 6% (n = 1) 6% (n = 1) |
|
Information collected by the IWSS available for CHN (638 alerts generated) - Alerts judged to have been useful (n = 608 validated) - Alerts which needed further investigation - Alerts judged to have been irrelevant - Alerts judged to have been technical errors |
23% (n = 137) 16% (n = 94) 56% (n = 337) 7% (n = 40) |