Table 1: Characteristics of studies included in this review.

Study and Year of Publication Year of Data Collection Design N Age (mean ± SD) Location (region) Refractive Error Definition Cycloplegic RE n Uncorrected RE (N) RE Types n(%)
Total RE M F Myopia Hyperope Astigmatism
Al-Rowaily. 2010 March to Oct 2008 Cross-sectional School-based 1319 *Age range 4-8 years Riyadh Central Myopia: ≤−0.50 SE (D) hyperopia: ≥2.0 SE (D) No (Non-cycloplegic retinoscopy) 60 24 36 - 25 23 33
Aldebasi. 2013 Sep 2010 - May 2011 Population school-based 5176 9.5 ± 1.8 Qassim Central Myopia: ≤−0.50 SE (D) hyperopia: ≥2.0 SE (D)
Astigmatism: <-0.75 Dc
Yes 963 400 446 846 580 177 89
Al Wadaani et al. 2011 2011 Cross-sectional 2246 9.4 ±2.3y Alehssa (Eastern) Myopia: ≤−0.75 SE (D) hyperopia: ≥2.0 SE (D)
Astigmatism: <-1.0 Dc
Yes 274 113 161 253 214 60 -
Alrahili et al. 2017 April to August 2015 Retrospective School-based 1893 9.4 ±2.3 Madina (Eastern) AAPOS guidelines [13] No (auto refractometer) 681 332 329 661 26 29 467
Alsaqr et al. 2017 Jan- July 2015 Cross-sectional School-based 335 4.5 ± 0.8 Riyadh Central Myopia: ≤−0.50 SE (D)hyperopia: ≥2.0 SE (D)
Astigmatism: <-1.0 Dc
No (Non-cycloplegic retinoscopy) 42 24 17 87 14 27 -
Al Bahhawi et al. 2018 Oct-15 School-basedCross-sectional 395 *Age range 6-14 years Jazan (South) Myopia: ≤−0.75 SE (D) hyperopia: ≥1.0 SE (D) No (Non-cycloplegic retinoscopy) 87 87 - 39 34 3
Yaser Z, 2019 January to July 2016 School-based Cross-sectional 414 7.1 ±0.8 and 4.1 ±0.8 Riyadh Central Myopia: ≤−0.50SE (D) hyperopia: ≥1.0 SE (D)
Astigmatism: <-2.0 Ds
No (spot screener) 94 31 64 77 46 13 39
Alghamdi, 2020 Nov 2019 to Jan 2020 School-based Cross-sectional 417 9.2 ± 1.9 Uyoun Aljawa Central Myopia: ≤−0.50 SE (D) hyperopia: ≥2.0 SE (D)
Astigmatism: <-1.0 Dc
No (Non-cycloplegic retinoscopy 82 82 79 32 38 13