Table 2: In vitro and in vivo nanotechnology in bone healing studies.

In Vitro Studies In Vivo Studies
Heparan sulphate, a MSC carrier, combined with electrospun PCL displayed improved in vitro growth of osteoprogenitor cells.
[8]
Peptide amphiphiles nanofibre combined with inert titanium foam to form a bioactive titanium foam. Bone formation within four weeks resulted after introduction into a rat femur.
[47]
Collagen with an electrospun PCL is associated with significantly increased cell adhesion and growth in vitro
[31]
Collagen with an electrospun PCL is associated with significantly increased cell infiltration in vivo
[35]
Electrospun β-TCP and HAp composite deposited greater MSC bone, both in vivo and in vitro, compared to each constituent alone.
[48]
Enhanced new bone formation in nanocrystalline HAp coated tantalum scaffolds, compared to conventional HAp coated tantalum scaffold
[49]
Nanoscale surface modification with biphasic calcium phosphate on titanium dental implants induced early osteoblastic differentiation and bone apposition both in vitro and in vivo
[23]
-
Osteoblasts cultured in vitro on nano-topographical surfaces are associated with increased adhesion, induction of metabolic activity, and release of osteoinductive factors
[28]
Cementless implants with microtextured surfaces, rather than smooth surfaces, have greater osteoid tissue and less fibrous tissue adhesion
[28]
Polymer/calcium phosphate nanocomposites demonstrated superior osteoblast alkaline phosphatase activity and osteoblast marker gene expression, promoting bone maturation in both in vitro and in vivo studies.
[50]
-