Table 1: Summary

Patients
No. of cases N=52
Mean age at index operation (range) in years 65.9 (38.4-89.0)
Mean follow up in years 5.63 (0.01-14.05)
Indication for primary THA
Primary osteoarthritis (OA) 21
Secondary OA due to dysplasia 17
Secondary OA after trauma 8
Secondary OA due to avasc. necrosis/Perthes 2
Secondary OA due to rheumatism 4
Indication for index operation
Aseptic loosening 42
Septic revision (one-stage/two-stage) 7 (2/5)
Recurrent dislocation 2
Breakage of acetabular component 1
Revised components Acetabulum
Acetabulum and femur
29
23
Side Left
Right
20
32
No. of acetabular revisions (index operation included) 2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
27
11
8
5
1
Methods
Surgical approach Anterior 5
Transgluteal 39
Transtrochanteric 8
Acetabular component Cemented PE 8
Roof Reinforcement Ring 29
Reconstruction Ring 15
Allogenous bone transplant None 8
Massive 2
Massive and Morselized 12
Morselized 30
Results: function and defect situation
Merle d’Aubignée-score (range) in points Preop.
latest follow-up
7.3 (0-14)
10.6 (0-17)
Pain (range) in points Preop.
latest follow-up
1.4 (0-6)
3.4 (0-6)
Movement (range) in points Preop.
latest follow-up
4.4 (0-6)
5.0 (0-6)
Mobility (range) in points Preop.
latest follow-up
1.5 (0-5)
2.2 (0-5)
No. of cases with ‘poor/tolerable/good’ Merle-Score (<9, 9-14, >14 pts.) Preop.
latest follow-up
32/20/ 0
13/31/8
Bone defect at latest follow-up (no. of cases) Increasing
Constant
Partial restoration
Complete
12
13
13
14