The Open Pain Journal


ISSN: 1876-3863 ― Volume 10, 2017
LETTER

Antimicrobial Activity of Lidocaine, Bupivacaine, Mepivacaine and Ropivacaine on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis



S. Neuwersch1, *, M. Köstenberger1, S. Sorschag2, W. Ilias3, R. Likar1
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, General Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
2 Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Microbiology, General Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
3 Vienna Private Clinic, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Introduction:

Various studies have shown a possible antimicrobial activity of different local anaesthetics, which may affect the results of microbial assessment of biopsies. The purpose of this study was to test the antimicrobial activity of different commonly used anaesthetic agents on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtitles to reproduce data and to compare the findings.

Methods:

Local anaesthetics tested were commercially available solutions of lidocaine (Xyloneural®, Xylanaest pur.®), bupivacaine (Bucain®), mepivacaine (Mecain®) and ropivacaine (Naropin®, Ropinaest®).2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.25% and 0.1% (20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1 mg/ml) dilutions of these local anaesthetics were prepared with sterile 0.9% saline. Bacteria used in this study were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. 10 μl of different local anaesthetic dilution placed on thin wafers were added to Mueller Hinton Agar and cultured. After 24 hours, a zone of inhibition around the wafers was evaluated.

Results:

Local anaesthetics in different concentrations did not show any zone of inhibition on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus or Bacillus subtilis.

Conclusion:

In summary, neither lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine nor ropivacaine showed an antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis.

Implications:

Due to these findings this local anaesthetics can be used in daily clinical routine to perform pain free diagnostic procedures in which culture specimens are to be obtained. Due to inconsistent results in prior studies, we recommend to use the lowest concentration possible of the local anaesthetic, also to avoid other possible side effects of local agents.

Keywords: Pain, Local anaestetic, Concentration, Antibacterial effect.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2017
Volume: 10
First Page: 1
Last Page: 4
Publisher Id: TOPAINJ-10-1
DOI: 10.2174/1876386301710010001

Article History:

Received Date: 24/08/2016
Revision Received Date: 04/01/2017
Acceptance Date: 06/01/2017
Electronic publication date: 28/02/2017
Collection year: 2017

© 2017 Neuwersch et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institution: General Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria; Tel: 0043/538/0; Email: stefan.neuwersch@kabeg.at




INTRODUCTION

In clinical practice local anaesthetics are used daily to perform pain free diagnostic procedures. However, various studies have shown a possible antimicrobial activity of different local anaesthetics, which may affect results in microbial assessment of biopsies. The purpose of this study was to test the antimicrobial activity of different commonly used anaesthetic agents on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis to reproduce data and to compare the findings.

METHODS

Local anaesthetics tested were commercially available solutions of lidocaine (Xyloneural®, Xylanaest pur.®), bupivacaine (Bucain®), mepivacaine (Mecain®) and ropivacaine (Naropin®, Ropinaest®). 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.25% and 0.1% (20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1 mg/ml) dilutions of these local anaesthetics were prepared with sterile 0.9% saline. Bacteria used in this study were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. The number of bacteria was prepared to achieve 0.5 McFarland standard and plated. 10 μl of different local anaesthetic dilution placed on thin wafers were added to Mueller Hinton Agar and cultured at 35°C. Wafers without local anaesthetics but 0.9% saline and wafers with ampicillin/sulbactam were used as controls. After 24 hours, a zone of inhibition around the wafers was evaluated, which is a wide ring around the wafer with no bacterial growth.

RESULTS

Local anaesthetics in different concentrations did not show any zone of inhibition on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus or Bacillus subtilis, which means that these bacteria have grown although there was a local anaesthetic (Figs. 1 and 2). Due to these findings the tests were repeated with commercially available undiluted local anaesthetics but with lower densities of microorganisms, according to McFarland standard of 0.25, 0.10 and 0.05 and 100 μl of different local anesthetic solution. After culturing for 24 hours at 35°C there again was no zone of inhibition on tested bacteria and no change in the surrounding bacterial concentration. In summary, 240 combinations of bacterial and local anaesthetics were tested (Table 1).

Fig. (1)
Local anaesthetics in different concentrations did not show any zone of inhibition on Bacillus subtilis.


Fig. (2)
Local anaesthetics in different concentrations did not show any zone of inhibition on Staphylococcus aureus.


Table 1
Local anaesthetics / zone of inhibition.


DISCUSSION

In clinical practise local anaesthetics are used daily to perform pain free diagnostic procedures. Considering the literature [1Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008; 9(2): 205-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2007.036] [PMID: 18426354]
], antimicrobial activity of local anaesthetics could lead to false-negative results in microbial assessment of biopsies. Potential mechanisms of these antimicrobial effects are lysis, increased cell wall permeability and dehydrogenase activity [2Leung YW, Rawal BD. Mechanism of action of tetracaine hydrochloride against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis 1977; 136(5): 679-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/136.5.679] [PMID: 410897]
]. Various studies conclude that prior to diagnostic biopsies the lowest concentration of local agents should be used or a ring block with additive-free local anaesthetics should be performed [1Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008; 9(2): 205-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2007.036] [PMID: 18426354]
, 3Berg JO, Mössner BK, Skov MN, Lauridsen J, Gottrup F, Kolmos HJ. Antibacterial properties of EMLA and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for culturing. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14(5): 581-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00157.x] [PMID: 17014670]
]. In 2010, Kose and colleagues [4Kose AA, Karabaggli Y, Kiremitci A, Kocman E, Cetin C. Do local anesthetics have antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus under in vivo conditions? An experimental study. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36(6): 848-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01559.x] [PMID: 20618369]
] showed that under in vivo conditions different local anaesthetics did not have any antimicrobial effects. Also Aydin et al. [5Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18(10): 687-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200110000-00008] [PMID: 11553246]
] found no antimicrobial properties of ropivacaine but antimicrobial effectiveness of lidocaine and prilocain was observed. The antibacterial activity of lidocaine was negative in a study performed by Berg et al. [3Berg JO, Mössner BK, Skov MN, Lauridsen J, Gottrup F, Kolmos HJ. Antibacterial properties of EMLA and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for culturing. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14(5): 581-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00157.x] [PMID: 17014670]
] but they showed that EMLA® has a powerful antibacterial effect. Due to these inconsistent results this present study was conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of different commonly used anesthetic agents on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. Neither lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine nor ropivacaine showed an antibacterial effect. We feel that our large sample size allows us to make a valid conclusion.

CONCLUSION

In summary, neither lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine nor ropivacaine showed an antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. Due to these findings this local anaesthetics can be used in daily clinical routine to perform pain free diagnostic procedures in which culture specimens are to be obtained. Due to inconsistant results in prior studies we recommend to use the lowest concentration possible of the local anaesthetic, also to avoid other possible side effects of local agents.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008; 9(2): 205-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2007.036] [PMID: 18426354]
[2] Leung YW, Rawal BD. Mechanism of action of tetracaine hydrochloride against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis 1977; 136(5): 679-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/136.5.679] [PMID: 410897]
[3] Berg JO, Mössner BK, Skov MN, Lauridsen J, Gottrup F, Kolmos HJ. Antibacterial properties of EMLA and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for culturing. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14(5): 581-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00157.x] [PMID: 17014670]
[4] Kose AA, Karabaggli Y, Kiremitci A, Kocman E, Cetin C. Do local anesthetics have antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus under in vivo conditions? An experimental study. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36(6): 848-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01559.x] [PMID: 20618369]
[5] Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18(10): 687-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200110000-00008] [PMID: 11553246]

Endorsements



"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."


Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."


Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."


Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."


Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."


Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."


Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."


Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."


J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."


Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."


Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."


Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."


Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."


Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."


M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."


Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."


Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."


Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."


Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."


Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."


Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)


Browse Contents


Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.com
Copyright © 2017 Bentham Open