Table 3: Coefficient analysis of RDR vs. T for Arrhenius relation.
| P(MPa) |
γ(rpm) |
C1 |
C2 |
R2 |
| 100 |
3 |
0.0375 |
167.2237 |
0.9857 |
|
6 |
0.0376 |
164.3890 |
0.9807 |
|
100 |
0.0423 |
153.5008 |
0.9861 |
|
200 |
0.0528 |
138.1225 |
0.9900 |
|
300 |
0.0643 |
126.4127 |
0.9892 |
|
600 |
0.0976 |
104.9750 |
0.9953 |
| 85 |
3 |
0.0375 |
167.2237 |
0.9857 |
|
6 |
0.0385 |
164.0179 |
0.9865 |
|
100 |
0.0416 |
155.4050 |
0.9873 |
|
200 |
0.0521 |
139.7473 |
0.9909 |
|
300 |
0.0635 |
127.8266 |
0.9901 |
|
600 |
0.0967 |
106.0262 |
0.9958 |
| 55 |
3 |
0.0383 |
164.7892 |
0.9842 |
|
6 |
0.0413 |
158.7604 |
0.9857 |
|
100 |
0.0469 |
147.3398 |
0.9859 |
|
200 |
0.0572 |
133.3671 |
0.9897 |
|
300 |
0.0658 |
124.9897 |
0.9917 |
|
600 |
0.0967 |
106.0262 |
0.9958 |
| 25 |
3 |
0.0383 |
164.7892 |
0.9842 |
|
6 |
0.0395 |
161.4868 |
0.9808 |
|
100 |
0.0469 |
147.3398 |
0.9859 |
|
200 |
0.0572 |
133.3671 |
0.9897 |
|
300 |
0.0658 |
124.9897 |
0.9917 |
|
600 |
0.0967 |
106.0262 |
0.9958 |
| 15 |
3 |
0.0401 |
161.9553 |
0.9885 |
|
6 |
0.0413 |
158.7615 |
0.9857 |
|
100 |
0.0461 |
147.5490 |
0.9837 |
|
200 |
0.0565 |
133.3969 |
0.9889 |
|
300 |
0.0667 |
123.5629 |
0.9908 |
|
600 |
0.985 |
103.9176 |
0.9947 |