Table 5: Comparison of the motivational factors among rural and urban origin students per university (n=1633).

Motivating Factors ROS n (%) UOS n (%) Total n (%) P-value
     1. SMU
Parents 113 (15.1) 78 (10.5) 191 (25.6) 0.179
Siblings 49 (6.6) 19 (2.5) 68 (9.1) 0.253
Other family members 39 (5.2) 18 (2.4) 57 (7.6) 0.436
Friends 35 (4.7) 14 (1.9) 49 (6.6) 0.440
Mentors 11 (1.5) 8 (1.1) 19 (2.6) 0.915
High school teachers 24 (3.2) 14 (1.9) 38 (5.1) 0.721
University lecturers 6 (0.8) 9 (1.2) 15 (2.0) 0.914
Role models 30 (4.0) 18 (2.4) 48 (6.4) 0.658
Personal exposure 113 (15.1) 78 (10.5) 191 (25.6) 0.179
Other 42 (5.6) 28 (3.8) 70 (9.4) 0.616
Total (SMU) 462 (61.9) 284 (38.1)      746 (100.0)
     2. UKZN ROS n (%) UOS n (%) Total n (%) P-value
Parents 33 (6.8) 120 (24.6) 153 (31.4) < 0.001*
Siblings 10 (2.0) 10 (2.0) 20 (4.1) 1.000
Other family members 8 (1.6) 12 (2.5) 20 (4.1) 0.843
Friends 6 (1.2) 9 (1.8) 15 (3.1) 0.894
Mentors 2 (0.4) 6 (1.2) 8 (1.6) 0.862
High school teachers 18 (3.7) 12 (2.5) 30 (6.1) 0.790
University lecturers 0 (0.0) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 0.902
Role models 11 (2.3) 13 (2.7) 24 (4.9) 0.930
Personal exposure 38 (7.8) 138 (28.3) 176 (36.1) < 0.001*
Other 11 (2.3) 28 (5.7) 39 (8.0) 0.447
Total (UKZN) 137 (28.1) 351 (71.9) 488 (100.0)
     3. UCT ROS n (%) UOS n (%) Total n (%) P-value
Parents 22 (5.5) 139 (34.9) 161 (40.4) < 0.001*
Siblings 3 (0.8) 6 (1.5) 9 (2.3) 0.892
Other family members 4 (1.0) 11 (2.8) 15 (3.8) 0.723
Friends 1 (0.3) 12 (3.0) 13 (3.3) 0.592
Mentors 1 (0.3) 8 (2.0) 9 (2.3) 0.742
High school teachers 2 (0.5) 7 (1.8) 9 (2.3) 0.802
University lecturers 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) -
Role models 4 (1.0) 17 (4.3) 21 (5.3) 0.511
Personal exposure 13 (3.3) 104 (26.1) 117 (29.3) < 0.001*
Other 5 (1.3) 40 (10.0) 45 (11.3) 0.076
Total (UCT) 55 (13.8) 344 (86.2) 399 (100.0)
GRAND TOTAL 654 (40.3) 979 (59.7) 1633 (100.0)

ROS: Rural-Origin Students; UOS: Urban-Origin Students; P-value (Fisher Exact)