The Open Public Health Journal




ISSN: 1874-9445 ― Volume 12, 2019
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Relationship Between Perceived Social Support in Pregnancy and Self-Efficacy for Childbirth Fear - A Cross-Sectional Study in Arak City, 2017



Katayon Vakilian*, Fatemeh Zarin, Hoda Zaraj
Medical School, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

Abstract

Background:

It seems that with perceived social support, self-efficacy for childbirth fear can be strengthened in pregnant women. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived social support in pregnancy and self-efficacy for childbirth fear in Arak.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 180 pregnant women. Sampling was done on convenience and health centers were selected randomly. After receiving written consent, the standard questionnaire of perceived social support and the self-efficacy for childbirth fear was given to pregnant women. The questionnaires were collected immediately after completion. After collecting the data, the information was entered into the spss18 software and the Pearson test was used for data analysis.

Results:

The mean score of self-efficacy for childbirth fear, and perceived social support were 34.55±8.183, 23.93±11.047 respectively. Also, there was no correlation between self-efficacy for childbirth fear and family, friends, and others perceived social support (p >0.05).

Conclusion:

From the results it seems that the subjective evaluation of the individual from her supporters during pregnancy is not effective on self-efficacy for childbirth fear which is subjective as well. Therefore, health providers should involve directly the husband and the wife’s family regarding supporting the pregnant woman during prenatal care.

Keywords: Self-efficacy, Fear, Normal childbirth, Social support, Women, Antenatal.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2018
Volume: 11
First Page: 546
Last Page: 551
Publisher Id: TOPHJ-11-546
DOI: 10.2174/1874944501811010546

Article History:

Received Date: 2/9/2018
Revision Received Date: 14/11/2018
Acceptance Date: 21/12/2018
Electronic publication date: 31/12/2018
Collection year: 2018

Article Metrics:

CrossRef Citations:
0

Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 95
Abstract HTML Views: 79
PDF Downloads: 46
ePub Downloads: 39
Total Views/Downloads: 259

Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 75
Abstract HTML Views: 57
PDF Downloads: 32
ePub Downloads: 31
Total Views/Downloads: 195
Geographical View

© 2018 Vakilian et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the Medical School, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Basij Square, Arak, Iran; Tel: 098-8634173524; Emails: dr.kvakilian@arakmu.ac.ir, cattyv2002@yahoo.com




1. INTRODUCTION

Childbirth is a multidimensional process with physical, emotional, social, physiological, cultural and psychological dimensions and is regarded as a critical experience in the life of a woman [1Cunnigham F, Leveno K, Bloom SL, et al. Williams Obstetrics 2016.]. Delivery as the most stressful physical and mental incident for women affects physiological and psychological indices of women pregnancy and childbirth [2Khorsandi M, Vakilian K, Salehi B, Goudarzi MT, Abdi M. The effects of stress inoculation training on perceived stress in pregnant women. J Health Psychol 2016; 21(12): 2977-82.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105315589800] [PMID: 26150431] ]. Factors such as labor pain, previous labor experience, previous gynecological problems, including emergency cesarean section, mother personality characteristics such as anxiety, low self-esteem, marital dissatisfaction, lack of social support and low self-efficacy are related to mother’s fear of childbirth [2Khorsandi M, Vakilian K, Salehi B, Goudarzi MT, Abdi M. The effects of stress inoculation training on perceived stress in pregnant women. J Health Psychol 2016; 21(12): 2977-82.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105315589800] [PMID: 26150431] -4Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Karlström A, Hildingsson I. Self reported fear of childbirth and its association with women’s birth experience and mode of delivery: A longitudinal population-based study. Women Birth 2012; 25(3): 114-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2011.06.001] [PMID: 21764400] ]. If a pregnant woman feels that she can deal with stress well, she may be overcome the adverse effects of stress on her health and her fetuses, such as an increase in chances of cesarean section, increased labor pain, negative childbirth experience, impairment in the process of delivery, postpartum mental illness and breastfeeding problems [5Storksen HT, Eberhard-Gran M, Garthus-Niegel S, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth; The relation to anxiety and depression. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91(2): 237-42.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01323.x] [PMID: 22085403] -7Laursen M, Hedegaard M, Johansen C. Fear of childbirth: Predictors and temporal changes among nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG 2008; 115(3): 354-60.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01583.x] [PMID: 18190372] ]. One of the important factors for the coping behavior in stressful situations is self-efficacy. Self-efficacy consists of two components: “Expected Outcome” and “Expected Self-efficacy”. Expected outcome refers to the individual's belief that a particular behavior leads to a specific outcome. Expected self-efficacy refers to the individual's belief in his ability to succeed in behavior and the extent to which he controls the circumstances [6Adams SS, Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: A study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery. BJOG 2012; 119(10): 1238-46.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03433.x] [PMID: 22734617] -8Ip WY, Tang CS, Goggins WB. An educational intervention to improve women’s ability to cope with childbirth. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18(15): 2125-35.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02720.x] [PMID: 19583645] ]. Bandura believes that self-efficacy affects all aspects of behavior and emotional activities such as anxiety, stress, and patterns of thought [9Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 2004; 42(10): 1129-48.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008] [PMID: 15350854] ]. One of these stressful situations is delivery. Self-efficacy of childbirth is one of the effective factors in coping with this stressful situation and the implementation of behaviors consistent with labor pain [10Khorsandi M, Ghofranipour F, Faghihzadeh S, Hidarnia A, Bagheban AA, Aguilar-Vafaie ME. Iranian version of childbirth self-efficacy inventory. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17(21): 2846-55.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02385.x] [PMID: 19012756] , 11Tanglakmankhong K, Perrin NA, Lowe NK. Childbirth self-efficacy inventory and childbirth attitudes questionnaire: Psychometric properties of Thai language versions. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67(1): 193-203.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05479.x] [PMID: 21158905] ]. On the other hand, social support has a significant effect on reducing stress, depression, and distress, and directly associates with social skills and reduction of the duration of the disease.

Perceived social support is the subjective perception of the individual that the people who matter to me are alongside me and I can count on their help when in need. Social support enables the individual to self-care, moderate the response of people to stress and protect people from the threatening effects of stress. The sense of support in pregnancy can reduce pregnancy-related depression and stress [12Nylen KJ, O’Hara MW, Engeldinger J. Perceived social support interacts with prenatal depression to predict birth outcomes. J Behav Med 2013; 36(4): 427-40.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9436-y] [PMID: 22710981] , 13Edmonds JK, Paul M, Sibley LM. Type, content, and source of social support perceived by women during pregnancy: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 2011; 29(2): 163-73.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v29i2.7859] [PMID: 21608426] ]. Considering that many types of research have been done on social support, few studies have been conducted on the relationship between perceived social support and self-efficacy for childbirth fears, so researchers decided to do this research with the aim of the relationship between the perceived social support in the primiparous women and self-efficacy for childbirth fear.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Arak University of Medical Sciences in 2016. According to the Cochran formula, 95% confidence interval and P = q = 0.5 were selected as default; the error value was 0.04 and 180 people were considered. The last trimester pregnant women were studied in Arak clinics. After obtaining permission from Arak University of Medical Sciences, sampling was done randomly from selected health centers. The health center lists were prepared from the East, West, North and South and Arak center. After drawing, five centers (one center from each region) out of 40 entered the sampling. After that, pregnant women referred to the health centers were included in the study based on convincing sampling. Women who had the inclusion criteria, after obtaining written consent entered the sampling. Inclusion criteria were women who had a pregnancy without complications, were not opting for divorce, and had a gestational age greater than 35 weeks. In this study, a standard questionnaire of perceived social support and self-efficacy for childbirth fear was filled. Social support was assessed using the standard 12-item questionnaire of perceived social support on a five-point Likert scale from strongly agree to disagree strongly. The questionnaire consisted of three sub-scales of perceived support from family, friends, and others (health providers). According to Salmi et al., Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of three dimensions of social support received by family, friends and close relations was 89%, 86% and 82% respectively [14Salami SO. Moderating effects of resilience, self-esteem and social support on adolescents’ reactions to violence. Asian Soc Sci 2010; 6(12): 101.[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n12p101] ]. The questionnaire of self-efficacy for childbirth fear included 14 items, and it was scored on a Likert scale ranging from never to very high (score 1 to 4). A high score showed high self-efficacy [10Khorsandi M, Ghofranipour F, Faghihzadeh S, Hidarnia A, Bagheban AA, Aguilar-Vafaie ME. Iranian version of childbirth self-efficacy inventory. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17(21): 2846-55.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02385.x] [PMID: 19012756] ]. After expressing the research goals, these two questionnaires were distributed among samples in the health clinics, and they were immediately collected after completion. After collecting data, the data were entered into the spss18 software and Pearson test was used for data analysis.

3. RESULTS

Results showed that the mean age of women was 29.166 ± 5.814. The minimum age of women was 17 years, and the maximum was 43 years. Other demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. The Mean score of self-efficacy for fear of childbirth and perceived social support is showed in Table 2.

Table 1
Demographic characteristics in pregnant women.


Table 2
Mean score of perceived social support and self- efficacy fear of childbirth in pregnant women.


The present study showed that there was no significant correlation between Family perceived social support (r = -0.071, P= 0.17), friends perceived social support (r = 0.069, P=0.17), and others such as health providers (r= -0.078, P=0.29) in self-efficacy for childbirth fear. Other results were included in Table 3.

Table 3
Correlation analysis of social support and self-efficacy of pregnant women (r).


4. DISCUSSION

This study showed that there is no significant relationship between perceived social support and self-efficacy for childbirth fear. The reason may be that we studied the sense of support, not real support. Studies show that real support influences fear and self-efficacy. The correlational research was done on childbirth fear, and social support in 180 low-risk pregnant women referred to Mashhad's health centers and their husbands who were selected by multi-stage sampling method. The frequency of pregnant women with childbirth fear was 3.68%, and the rate of those who did not fear childbirth was 7.31%. The results showed that there is a significant difference in the social support of the husband in the childbirth preparation classes between women with childbirth fear and those who did not fear childbirth [14Salami SO. Moderating effects of resilience, self-esteem and social support on adolescents’ reactions to violence. Asian Soc Sci 2010; 6(12): 101.[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n12p101] ]. In some previous studies, the role of social support on self-efficacy has been examined. A study showed that multiparous women who did not have husband support had a lower level of childbirth self-efficacy than primiparous women who did not have husband support. Women who have already experienced childbirth may have thought about the value of having a trusted support person in labor [15Oveisi S. The effects of spouse participation in childbirth preparation classes on fear of childbirth and Select the type of delivery in Nulliparous women 2017. [in persian]]. Fleming et al. reported that multiparous women who are alone in labor (lack of husband support) have low self-efficacy and high anxiety. On the contrary, the primiparous women enter an environment that requires the caring and support of labor staff, and therefore their dependence on a supporting partner is unnecessary for the success of childbirth [16Schwartz L, Toohill J, Creedy DK, Baird K, Gamble J, Fenwick J. Factors associated with childbirth self-efficacy in Australian childbearing women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 29.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0465-8] [PMID: 25879780] ].

Pregnant women seem to have a greater sense of support than non-pregnant women, while a study showed that this difference was not significant [17Fleming SE, Smart D, Eide P. Grand multiparous women’s perceptions of birthing, nursing care, and childbirth technology. J Perinat Educ 2011; 20(2): 108-17. [doi].[http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.20.2.108] [PMID: 22379359] ]. A study also found that social support was a predictor of childbirth fears and the increase of support reduced the fears [18Azimi M, Fahami F, Mohamadirizi S. The relationship between perceived social support in the first pregnancy and fear of childbirth. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2018; 23(3): 235-9. [doi].[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_170_16] [PMID: 29861764] ]. Fisher et.al. showed that social relationships, informal support networks for pregnant women and strong support of midwives could strengthen the women's belief in the fact that labor is a physiological and controllable process. As a result, this psychological feeling can reduce the fear of childbirth [19Fisher C, Hauck Y, Fenwick J. How social context impacts on women's fears of childbirth: A Western Australian example. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63(1): 64-75.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.065] ]. The difference between the present study and the studies showing the reduction of fear and stress with social support is that in their studies, the actual support meaning the presence of supporters was investigated when necessary, while in this study, the individual's perception of those who can help her when necessary was studied which is a subjective phenomenon. The study results of Badaghi showed that there is a reverse relationship between anxiety, depression, and stress in pregnant women and social support [20Bodaghi E, Alipour F, Bodaghi M, Nori R, Peiman N, Saeidpour S. The role of spirituality and social support in pregnant women’s anxiety, depression and stress symptoms. J Community Health 2017; 10(2): 72-82.] while in the study of Shishehgar et.al., there was no significant relationship between social support and stress in pregnancy [21Shishehgar S, Mahmoodi A, Dolatian M, Mahmoodi Z, Bakhtiary M, Alavi Majd H. The relationship of social support and quality of life with the level of stress in pregnant women using the PATH model. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013; 15(7): 560-5. [doi].[http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.12174] [PMID: 24396574] ]. The difference between the present study and the studies mentioned above was that the pregnant women's stress was studied in the above studies, while in the present study, childbirth fear was examined. A study by Salomonson et al., which was conducted in Sweden in 2013 entitled “Perceived self-efficacy and childbirth fear in primiparous women,” showed that when there is no preference for cesarean section, self-efficacy has a direct relationship with labor fear. It means that the reduction of self-efficacy increases the labor fear. Also, it was shown that increased self-efficacy in women during pregnancy could be effective in reducing the fear of childbirth and these programs can be part of a pregnancy-based educational program for women [22Salomonsson B, Gullberg MT, Alehagen S, Wijma K. Self-efficacy beliefs and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 34(3): 116-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2013.824418] [PMID: 23952169] ]. In this study, the general self-efficacy of mothers was examined, which was different from the present study, because in this study, fear self-efficacy was used and its relationship with perceived social support was measured.

CONCLUSION

It seems that the individual's subjective assessment of her supporters during her pregnancy does not associate with self-efficacy for labor fear which is subjective as well. It seems that health providers should ask people with whom the pregnant mother has a direct relationship such as husband, to involve actively in the process of supporting during pregnancy.

CONTRIBUTOR STATEMENT

The main idea was proposed by Fatemeh Zarin. The initial draft was prepared by Fatemeh Zarin and Katayon Vakilian and the final draft was prepared by Vakilian.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This research was approved by the Student Research Committee with the financial code: 2743 and ethics code: IR.ARAKMU.REC.1395.352.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No humans/animals were used for the studies that are basis of this research.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the research deputy of Arak University of Medical Sciences, who collaborated in the approval of the project. Also, the researchers thank the Student Research Committee and the participants in this study.

REFERENCES

[1] Cunnigham F, Leveno K, Bloom SL, et al. Williams Obstetrics 2016.
[2] Khorsandi M, Vakilian K, Salehi B, Goudarzi MT, Abdi M. The effects of stress inoculation training on perceived stress in pregnant women. J Health Psychol 2016; 21(12): 2977-82.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105315589800] [PMID: 26150431]
[3] Vakilian K, Khorsandi M, Jafarimanesh H, Ranjbaran M. Development and psychometrics of perceived experiences of natural vaginal childbirth in iranian primiparous women questionnaire. CJMB 2018; 5: 95-100.
[4] Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Karlström A, Hildingsson I. Self reported fear of childbirth and its association with women’s birth experience and mode of delivery: A longitudinal population-based study. Women Birth 2012; 25(3): 114-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2011.06.001] [PMID: 21764400]
[5] Storksen HT, Eberhard-Gran M, Garthus-Niegel S, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth; The relation to anxiety and depression. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91(2): 237-42.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01323.x] [PMID: 22085403]
[6] Adams SS, Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: A study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery. BJOG 2012; 119(10): 1238-46.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03433.x] [PMID: 22734617]
[7] Laursen M, Hedegaard M, Johansen C. Fear of childbirth: Predictors and temporal changes among nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG 2008; 115(3): 354-60.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01583.x] [PMID: 18190372]
[8] Ip WY, Tang CS, Goggins WB. An educational intervention to improve women’s ability to cope with childbirth. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18(15): 2125-35.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02720.x] [PMID: 19583645]
[9] Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 2004; 42(10): 1129-48.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008] [PMID: 15350854]
[10] Khorsandi M, Ghofranipour F, Faghihzadeh S, Hidarnia A, Bagheban AA, Aguilar-Vafaie ME. Iranian version of childbirth self-efficacy inventory. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17(21): 2846-55.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02385.x] [PMID: 19012756]
[11] Tanglakmankhong K, Perrin NA, Lowe NK. Childbirth self-efficacy inventory and childbirth attitudes questionnaire: Psychometric properties of Thai language versions. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67(1): 193-203.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05479.x] [PMID: 21158905]
[12] Nylen KJ, O’Hara MW, Engeldinger J. Perceived social support interacts with prenatal depression to predict birth outcomes. J Behav Med 2013; 36(4): 427-40.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9436-y] [PMID: 22710981]
[13] Edmonds JK, Paul M, Sibley LM. Type, content, and source of social support perceived by women during pregnancy: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 2011; 29(2): 163-73.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v29i2.7859] [PMID: 21608426]
[14] Salami SO. Moderating effects of resilience, self-esteem and social support on adolescents’ reactions to violence. Asian Soc Sci 2010; 6(12): 101.[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n12p101]
[15] Oveisi S. The effects of spouse participation in childbirth preparation classes on fear of childbirth and Select the type of delivery in Nulliparous women 2017. [in persian]
[16] Schwartz L, Toohill J, Creedy DK, Baird K, Gamble J, Fenwick J. Factors associated with childbirth self-efficacy in Australian childbearing women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 29.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0465-8] [PMID: 25879780]
[17] Fleming SE, Smart D, Eide P. Grand multiparous women’s perceptions of birthing, nursing care, and childbirth technology. J Perinat Educ 2011; 20(2): 108-17. [doi].[http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.20.2.108] [PMID: 22379359]
[18] Azimi M, Fahami F, Mohamadirizi S. The relationship between perceived social support in the first pregnancy and fear of childbirth. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2018; 23(3): 235-9. [doi].[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_170_16] [PMID: 29861764]
[19] Fisher C, Hauck Y, Fenwick J. How social context impacts on women's fears of childbirth: A Western Australian example. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63(1): 64-75.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.065]
[20] Bodaghi E, Alipour F, Bodaghi M, Nori R, Peiman N, Saeidpour S. The role of spirituality and social support in pregnant women’s anxiety, depression and stress symptoms. J Community Health 2017; 10(2): 72-82.
[21] Shishehgar S, Mahmoodi A, Dolatian M, Mahmoodi Z, Bakhtiary M, Alavi Majd H. The relationship of social support and quality of life with the level of stress in pregnant women using the PATH model. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013; 15(7): 560-5. [doi].[http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.12174] [PMID: 24396574]
[22] Salomonsson B, Gullberg MT, Alehagen S, Wijma K. Self-efficacy beliefs and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 34(3): 116-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2013.824418] [PMID: 23952169]

Endorsements



"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."


Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."


Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."


Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."


Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."


Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."


Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."


Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."


J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."


Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."


Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."


Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."


Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."


Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."


M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."


Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."


Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."


Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."


Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."


Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."


Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)


Browse Contents



Advertisements


Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.net
Copyright © 2019 Bentham Open