Table 5: Fuzzy and fractiles of risk obtained by the three approaches.

Scenario-I Nature Risk Value
Fuzzy [2.661e-10, 3.743e-09, 1.522e-08]
Possibility Fractiles
95th 85th 65th 45th 25th 15th
[3.028e-09, 1.243e-08] [2.599e-09, 1.132e-08] [1.87e-09, 9.391e-09] [1.262e-09, 7.63e-09] [7.609e-10, 6.057e-09] [5.247e-10, 5.208e-09]
Credibility 1.03e-08 8.524e-09 5.531e-09 3.25e-09 1.508e-09 9.766e-10
Scenario-II Fuzzy [1.468e-09, 3.743e-09, 8.041e-09]
Possibility Fractiles
95th 85th 65th 45th 25th 15th
[3.375e-09, 5.955e-09] [3.282e-09, 5.378e-09] [3.088e-09, 4.903e-09] [2.916e-09, 4.642e-09] [2.676e-09, 4.398e-09] [2.465e-09, 4.253e-09]
Credibility 5.485e-09 4.926e-09 4.334e-09 3.435e-09 2.996e-09 2.791e-09
Scenario-III Fuzzy [3.596e-10, 3.743e-09, 1.287e-08]
Possibility Fractiles
95th 85th 65th 45th 25th 15th
[3.015e-09, 1.005e-08] [2.68e-09, 9.022e-09] [2.073e-09, 7.706e-09] [1.579e-09, 6.745e-09] [1.073e-09, 5.788e-09] [8.301e-10, 5.322e-09]
Credibility 8.378e-09 6.854e-09 5.102e-09 3.284e-09 1.923e-09 1.284e-09
Note: ne-m is read as nx10-m. For example, 3e-04 is read as 3x10-4