| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| • It has the ability to represent imprecision, uncertainty of risk assessment model in its own way. • Application for wide range of hazardous materials. • Risk values can also be interpreted in terms of optimistic decision makers’ point of view. • Less financial cost for data collection • No additional effort required. • Readers’ friendly tools to understand. • Credibility distribution tool provides quite precise risk values. • Ability to define the range of risk values |
• Lack of data may leads to imprecise results • Two risk assessment techniques provide little bit imprecise values. • Under/over estimation of data. • Some parameters of risk model may overlook. • All tools have inherent limitations of their own. |
| Opportunities | Threats |
| • It provides assistance to scientists, environmentalists, experts to carry out health risk assessment providing better efficiency to the output. • It has more utility because of its ability to represent imprecision, uncertainty of risk assessment model in its own way. • People living in the locality of industries, nuclear power plant etc. from where radiation exposed will be benefited. • Although this study is carried out in non cancer risk assessment model, but it has the ability to use in any model where model parameters tainted with epistemic uncertainty. • All uncertainty modelling community of researchers can adopt these tools • Software module can be formulated for such types of study |
• Will accept the tools by scientists, environmentalists, experts? • Will the tools live up promise and results in deliverables? • Readers might get confronted with decision on acceptability of risk. |