Table 6: Traffic simulation model output about fuel consumption and pollutant emission.

Traffic
Scenario
Fuel Consumption and Pollutant Emission Rate
Fuel Consumption
(l)
CO2
(g/km)
NOX
(g/km)
PM
(g/km)
VOC
(g/km)
(NBL) (CBL) (MBL) (NBL) (CBL) (MBL) (NBL) (CBL) (MBL) (NBL) (CBL) (MBL) (NBL) (CBL) (MBL)
Scenario 1 3,195.66 3,058.63 3,025.40 7,466,825.84 7,335,318.35 7,219,963.02 23,355.96 22,924.91 22,617.88 3,744.00 3,565.90 3,505.60 3,854.78 3,833.94 3,823.66
%Diff.* 4.29% 5.33% 1.76% 3.31% 1.85% 3.16% 4.76% 6.37% 0.54% 0.81%
Scenario 2 3,195.66 2,723.97 2,730.54 7,466,825.84 6,552,181.03 6,503,285.82 23,355.96 20,578.94 20,309.76 3,744.00 3,150.05 3,138.24 3,854.78 3,425.66 3,439.11
%Diff.* 14.76% 14.55% 12.25% 12.90% 11.89% 13.04% 15.86% 16.18% 11.13% 10.78%
Scenario 3 3,195.66 2,429.60 2,450.71 7,466,825.84 5,840,660.79 5,827,160.92 23,355.96 18,293.23 18,231.72 3,744.00 2,802.15 2,844.52 3,854.78 3,077.81 3,059.35
%Diff.* 23.97% 23.31% 21.78% 21.96% 21.68% 21.94% 25.16% 24.02% 20.16% 20.63%
Scenario 4 3,195.66 2,143.41 2,166.64 7,466,825.84 5,146,902.28 5,145,879.81 23,355.96 16,168.16 16,073.42 3,744.00 2,475.89 2,520.34 3,854.78 2,705.87 2,699.65
%Diff.* 32.93% 32.20% 31.07% 31.08% 30.78% 31.18% 33.87% 32.68% 29.80% 29.97%
Scenario 5 3,195.66 1,844.39 1,872.00 7,466,825.84 4,426,682.50 4,444,426.41 23,355.96 13,866.09 13,883.61 3,744.00 2,127.10 2,181.14 3,854.78 2,341.81 2,329.94
%Diff.* 42.28% 41.42% 40.72% 40.48% 40.63% 40.56% 43.19% 41.74% 39.25% 39.56%
Scenario 6 3,195.66 1,551.51 1,587.40 7,466,825.84 3,722,692.32 3,756,228.49 23,355.96 11,654.81 11,695.26 3,744.00 1,786.65 1,847.67 3,854.78 1,975.98 1,967.61
%Diff.* 51.45% 50.33% 50.14% 49.69% 50.10% 49.93% 52.28% 50.65% 48.74% 48.96%

Note: Diff.* difference value of result between:
§ Non-Bike Lanes (NBL) CAR and Conventional Bike Lanes (CBL) CAR calculated as:
Diff.*(CBL)CAR =
§ Non-Bike Lanes (NBL) CAR and Median Bike Lanes (MBL) CAR calculated as:
Diff.*(MBL)CAR =