Abstract HTML Views: 697 PDF Downloads: 278 Total Views/Downloads: 1205
Abstract HTML Views: 456 PDF Downloads: 174 Total Views/Downloads: 803
The arithmetic average of beat-by-beat sampled heart rate (HR) values overestimates true HR defined as
number of heart beats per time unit. The aims of this study were to (1) estimate the magnitude of overestimation; (2)
illustrate the significance of this issue using data from patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and control subjects;
and (3) outline approaches to correctly calculate mean HR.
Linear regression analysis of computer-generated time series, representing beat-by-beat HR values in humans, rats, and
mice, revealed that the difference between the arithmetic average of beat-by-beat sampled HR values and the true mean
HR (error ε) can be approximated by the variance (σ2) divided by the arithmetic average (μ) of the beat-by-beat HR values
(ε = σ2/μ).
True mean HR was higher in patients with CHF (92.9±4.3 bpm) than in control subjects (82.6±2.1 bpm, P=0.045).
However, if mean HR was calculated as arithmetic average of the beat-by-beat HR values the difference in mean HR was
no longer significant (93.4±4.4 bpm in CHF vs. 83.8±2.1 bpm in controls, P=0.059).
In conclusion, the arithmetic average of beat-by-beat sampled HR values overestimates true HR by approximately the
ratio of σ2 to μ of the beat-by-beat HR values. Thus, the error (ε) is largest in subjects with high HR variability and low
average HR and may affect interpretation of mean HR values in studies investigating populations of subjects with
differing HR variability, such as CHF patients vs. healthy subject or old vs. young subjects.