The Open Dentistry Journal




ISSN: 1874-2106 ― Volume 14, 2020
CASE REPORT

Modified Orthodontic Bone Stretching for Ankylosed Tooth Repositioning: A Case Report.



Claudio Stacchi1, *, Luca Barlone1, Antonio Rapani1, Federico Berton1, Luca Contardo1, Roberto Di Lenarda1
1 Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

Abstract

Background:

Different approaches were proposed in the literature for the treatment of malpositioned ankylosed teeth. The present case report describes a modification of Orthodontic Bone Stretching Technique (OBS) for the repositioning of ankylosed teeth, consisting of dentoalveolar segmental osteotomies performed with piezoelectric instruments followed by orthodontic and orthopedic traction.

Case Report:

A 22-year-old female in good general health was referred by her orthodontist due to an infraoccluded and ankylosed maxillary upper left canine. Attempts of conventional and corticotomy-assisted orthodontic alignment of the tooth were previously performed with no success. After elevating a full-thickness flap, three osteotomies were performed by using piezoelectric inserts (Piezotome Cube, Acteon, Merignac, France). Mesial and distal cuts were full-thickness osteotomies, parallel to the long axis of the tooth, through the buccal and palatal cortical plates. The apical osseous incision was a horizontal corticotomy, involving only the buccal plate, and connecting the vertical osteotomies two millimetres over the apex of the tooth. Heavy orthodontic forces were immediately applied by using both dental and skeletal anchorage. The initial movement of the dentoalveolar segment was observed three weeks after surgery and case finishing has been completed in two months. At a one-year follow-up, the repositioned canine showed good periodontal conditions, no discoloration and positive pulp response to the electric test.

Conclusion:

Modified OBS technique was effective in repositioning an infraoccluded and ankylosed maxillary canine, providing satisfactory function and esthetics with short treatment time.

Keywords: Ankylosed tooth, Tooth repositioning, Piezosurgery, Surgically assisted orthodontics, Case report, Orthodontic bone stretching technique.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2020
Volume: 14
First Page: 235
Last Page: 239
Publisher Id: TODENTJ-14-235
DOI: 10.2174/1874210602014010235

Article History:

Received Date: 17/03/2020
Revision Received Date: 07/04/2020
Acceptance Date: 08/04/2020
Electronic publication date: 23/05/2020
Collection year: 2020

© 2020 Stacchi et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; Tel: +0481531229; E-mail: claudio@stacchi.it





1. INTRODUCTION

Treatment time reduction is gaining increasing importance for lowering costs and enhancing patient satisfaction. In orthodontics, new approaches including corticotomies, piezocision and the use of Temporary Anchorage Device Systems (TADS) have been proposed with the aim to shorten the duration of therapy [1Rekhi U, Catunda RQ, Gibson MP. Surgically accelerated orthodontic techniques and periodontal response: A systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2020.cjz103 Epub ahead of print
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz103] [PMID: 31942984]
]. Moreover, the concept of regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP) [2Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: A review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1983; 31(1): 3-9.
[PMID: 6345475]
] and the development of the skeletal anchorage system using mini-screws and plates enabled the application of orthopedic force in addition to conventional orthodontic force [3Lee W. Corticotomy for orthodontic tooth movement. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 44(6): 251-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.251] [PMID: 30637238]
]. The same techniques have been studied to facilitate dental movement even in ankylosed teeth. However, no robust scientific evidence is available on this topic due to the absence of studies with adequate sample size and long follow-up [4Cano J, Campo J, Bonilla E, Colmenero C. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Exp Dent 2012; 4(1): e54-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50642] [PMID: 24558526]
].

Piezoelectric bone surgery has been introduced since the beginning of this century as a promising alternative to conventional rotary instruments in performing osteotomies [5Vercellotti T. Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: A case report--a new piezoelectric ridge expansion technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20(4): 358-65.
[PMID: 11203575]
]. The mechanical action of piezoelectric devices consists of bone micronization produced by ultrasonic shock waves conducted by working tips vibrating with a frequency varying from 24 to 36 kHz. The main advantages of piezosurgery are represented by the micrometric cut (leading to thin and precise osteotomies) [6Perfetti G, De Tullio I, Berardi D, Di Iorio D, Spoto G, Scarano A. Micromorphometrical and histological analyses using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2012; 26(2)(Suppl.): 81-8.
[PMID: 23164332]
, 7Stacchi C, Berton F, Turco G, et al. Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44(9): 1143-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.024] [PMID: 27527676]
], the selective action on hard tissues [8Otake Y, Nakamura M, Henmi A, Takahashi T, Sasano Y. Experimental comparison of the performance of cutting bone and soft tissue between piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 17154.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35295-6] [PMID: 30464184]
] and the positive influence on bone healing when compared to conventional rotary instruments [9Preti G, Martinasso G, Peirone B, et al. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: A pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol 2007; 78(4): 716-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060285] [PMID: 17397320]
, 10Aimetti M, Ferrarotti F, Bergandi L, Saksing L, Parducci F, Romano F. Increase in periodontal interleukin-1β gene expression following osseous resective surgery using conventional rotary instruments compared with piezosurgery: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 36(4): 489-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.2835] [PMID: 27333006]
]. These features paved the way for a wide diffusion of piezoelectric bone surgery in various clinical applications of oral [11Stacchi C, Vercellotti T, Toschetti A, Speroni S, Salgarello S, Di Lenarda R. Intraoperative complications during sinus floor elevation using two different ultrasonic approaches: A two-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(Suppl. 1): e117-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12136] [PMID: 23968289]
, 12Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Cusimano P, et al. Bone scrapers versus piezoelectric surgery in the lateral antrostomy for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28(5): 1191-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003636] [PMID: 28538071]
] and craniofacial surgery [13Nordera P, Spanio di Spilimbergo S, Stenico A, Fornezza U, Volpin L, Padula E. The cutting-edge technique for safe osteotomies in craniofacial surgery: the piezosurgery bone scalpel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120(7): 1989-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000287328.56050.4e] [PMID: 18090764]
, 14Robiony M, Lazzarotto A, Nocini R, Costa F, Sembronio S, Franz L. Piezosurgery: ten years’ experience of percutaneous osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77(6): 1237-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.035] [PMID: 30802420]
] and implantology [15Vercellotti T, Stacchi C, Russo C, et al. Ultrasonic implant site preparation using piezosurgery: A multicenter case series study analyzing 3,579 implants with a 1- to 3-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014; 34(1): 11-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.1860] [PMID: 24396835]
, 16Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Baldi D, et al. Immediate loading of implant-supported single crowns after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BioMed Res Int 2018; 20186817154
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6817154] [PMID: 30186865]
].

The combined action of RAP and piezoelectric surgery was recently exploited to treat ankylosed teeth with Orthodontic Bone Stretching approach (OBS) [17Bousquet P, Artz C, Renaud M, Canal P. Relocation of infrapositioned ankylosed teeth: Description of orthodontic bone stretching and case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(10): 1914-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.002] [PMID: 27371872]
]. OBS is a surgically-assisted orthodontic movement consisting of partial osteotomies, without the mobilization or repositioning of the alveolar segment, combined with the application of orthodontic forces.

The present case report describes a modification of the OBS technique for the repositioning of ankylosed teeth, consisting of piezoelectric osteotomies of variable depth followed by orthodontic traction with dental and skeletal anchorage, with the aim to reduce treatment time without increasing the risk of possible complications or side effects.

2. CASE DESCRIPTION

A 22-year-old female in good general health was referred by her orthodontist due to an infraoccluded and ankylosed maxillary upper left canine. The patient underwent fixed orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery to correct severe skeletal Class II discrepancy and vertical hyperdivergent pattern [18Sambataro S, Lorusso P, Caprioglio A, Franchi L, Cicciù M, Fastuca R. Changes of occlusal plane in growing patients with increased vertical dimension during class ii correction by using cervical headgear. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31(1): 172-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006197] [PMID: 31842074]
]. Attempts of conventional and corticotomy-assisted orthodontic alignment of the upper left canine were previously made with no success.

Clinical examination showed multibracket orthodontic appliance in both upper and lower jaw. The upper left canine was partially erupted and infraoccluded in comparison with the adjacent teeth and with the contralateral one (Fig. 1A). Mesio-distal space between the lateral incisor and first premolar was sufficient to allow canine repositioning. The canine showed no discoloration and responded positively to the electric pulp test.

Fig. (1)
A) Pre-operative situation showing the ankylotic upper left canine, which was partially erupted and infraoccluded. B) Pre-operative radiograph showing reduced interradicular space between canine and first premolar.


The diagnosis of ankylosis was based on the clinical assessment of mobility and percussion sound, combined with the radiographic examination. Tapping on the upper left canine produced a high percussion sound and PTV (Periotest value; Periotest, Medizintechnik Gulden, Modautal, Germany) was lower than the contralateral canine (1 vs. 9), indicating the substantial absence of mobility. Radiographic examination showed breaks in the continuity of periodontal ligament, suggesting partial tooth ankylosis.

Additionally, a periapical radiograph showed sufficient inter radicular space to perform an osteotomy between the lateral incisor and the canine. Root proximity was present between canine and first premolar, with very limited inter radicular space (approximately 1 mm). Moreover, the root was curved in the distal direction, with the apex in close proximity with the maxillary sinus floor (Fig. 1B).

2.1. Surgical and Orthodontic Procedures

The outpatient surgical procedure was performed under local anesthesia (mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline 1:100.000). A full-thickness trapezoidal flap was elevated only on the buccal side, taking care to preserve mesial and distal papillae (Fig. 2A). Three osteotomies were performed by using piezoelectric inserts (Piezotome Cube, Acteon, Merignac, France): mesial and distal cuts were full-thickness osteotomies, parallel to the long axis of the tooth, through the buccal and the palatal cortical plates. The distal osteotomy was performed following the apical curve of the root in the distal direction (Fig. 2B). The apical osseous incision was a horizontal corticotomy, involving only the buccal plate, and connecting the vertical osteotomies two millimetres over the apex of the tooth (Fig. 2C). A careful luxation of the dentoalveolar segment was then performed with a spatula osteotome inserted in the apical corticotomy.

Fig. (2)
A) Elevation of a full thickness trapezoidal buccal flap, preserving mesial and distal papillae. B) Full thickness mesial and distal osteotomies were performed using piezoelectric instruments. C) Apical corticotomy connecting mesial and distal full thickness osteotomies two millimetres over the apex of the tooth.


The buccal flap was sutured to the undetached papillae with synthetic monofilament and a mini-screw was inserted between the first and second left lower premolars. Heavy orthodontic forces were immediately applied using 0.14 Ni-Ti rounded wire (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) and 1/8” 6 Oz. elastics (Lancer Orthodontics, Vista, CA, USA) between canine and lower mini-screw.

The patient was prescribed with amoxicillin (1 g tablets twice a day for 6 days), ibuprofen (600 mg tablets twice a day for 3 days) and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinse (3 times a day). Sutures were removed after ten days (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
A) Clinical view at suture removal, ten days after surgery. B) Ankylosed canine reached the final position two months after surgery. C) Clinical view at one-year follow up: canine maintained pulp vitality.


The initial movement of the dentoalveolar segment was observed three weeks after surgery. Finishing has been completed in two months by cutting the wire distal to the lateral incisor and continuing with the elastics as previously described. (Fig. 3B). After debonding, a fixed palatal retainer was applied to stabilize the mobilized dentoalveolar segment and maintain alignment of the entire upper arch.

At one-year follow-up, the repositioned canine showed good periodontal conditions, no discoloration and positive pulp response to the electric test. Treatment outcome totally fulfilled the patient’s aesthetic and functional expectations (Fig. 3C).

The present case report was presented accordingly to CARE statement (http://www.care-statement.org). The patient signed a consent form authorizing publication of clinical images and all data have been treated according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in Fortaleza (2013).

3. DISCUSSION

Tooth ankylosis consists of the anatomic fusion of root surface (either cementum or dentin) with the surrounding alveolar bone. This phenomenon has a multifactorial etiology (e.g. genetic factors, dental trauma), with the majority of cases occurring in deciduous molars (incidence ranging 1.5 to 9.9%) [19Biederman W. The problem of the ankylosed tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1968; (Jul): 409-24.
[PMID: 5240770]
]. Ankylosis is quite uncommon in permanent teeth, with an incidence reported to be ten times less frequent than in deciduous [19Biederman W. The problem of the ankylosed tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1968; (Jul): 409-24.
[PMID: 5240770]
]. Tooth ankylosis has also been reported as secondary to pre-orthodontic surgical uncovering of impacted teeth [20Becker A, Abramovitz I, Chaushu S. Failure of treatment of impacted canines associated with invasive cervical root resorption. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(5): 870-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/090812-716.1] [PMID: 23343004]
]. Possible explanations are related to mechanical or chemical damage (leakage of etching agents towards the cementoenamel junction during bonding of attachments) [21Vanarsdall RL. Correction of periodontal problems through orthodontic treatment.Orthodontics and periodontics 1985; 127-67.]. In rare cases of primary failure of eruption, ankylosis could also be the result of the application of inadequate orthodontic forces on infraoccluded teeth [22Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics 5th ed. 2012.].

When ankylosis occurs during facial growth, the tooth may fail to erupt properly, remaining impacted or apical to the occlusal plane. Possible treatment options for infraoccluded ankylotic teeth in adults include, in order of increasing invasivity: i) surgical luxation [19Biederman W. The problem of the ankylosed tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1968; (Jul): 409-24.
[PMID: 5240770]
, 21Vanarsdall RL. Correction of periodontal problems through orthodontic treatment.Orthodontics and periodontics 1985; 127-67.] ii) corticotomies [23Hwang DH, Park KH, Kwon YD, Kim SJ. Treatment of Class II open bite complicated by an ankylosed maxillary central incisor. Angle Orthod 2011; 81(4): 726-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/102010-578.1] [PMID: 21341998]
] iii) orthodontic bone stretching (OBS) [17Bousquet P, Artz C, Renaud M, Canal P. Relocation of infrapositioned ankylosed teeth: Description of orthodontic bone stretching and case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(10): 1914-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.002] [PMID: 27371872]
] iv) segmental osteotomies [24Medeiros PJ, Bezerra AR. Treatment of an ankylosed central incisor by single-tooth dento-osseous osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112(5): 496-501.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70076-3] [PMID: 9387835]
, 25Kofod T, Würtz V, Melsen B. Treatment of an ankylosed central incisor by single tooth dento-osseous osteotomy and a simple distraction device. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(1): 72-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.020] [PMID: 15643418]
] and v) tooth extraction. In the present case, after considering the previous failure of a corticotomy-assisted approach, we applied a modified version of OBS. OBS consists of mesial, distal and apical osteotomies involving only buccal cortical and cancellous bone preserving the palatal plate, followed by orthodontic traction [17Bousquet P, Artz C, Renaud M, Canal P. Relocation of infrapositioned ankylosed teeth: Description of orthodontic bone stretching and case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(10): 1914-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.002] [PMID: 27371872]
]. We modified the original OBS protocol by performing mesial and distal full-thickness osteotomies, through the buccal and palatal cortical plates, followed by miniscrew-anchored orthodontic traction [26Im JJ, Kye MK, Hwang KG, Park CJ. Miniscrew-anchored alveolar distraction for the treatment of the ankylosed maxillary central incisor. Dent Traumatol 2010; 26(3): 285-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00890.x] [PMID: 20572845]
]. This approach derives from the previously described implant relocation technique [27Stacchi C, Costantinides F, Biasotto M, Di Lenarda R. Relocation of a malpositioned maxillary implant with piezoelectric osteotomies: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28(5): 489-95.
[PMID: 18991000]
-29Stacchi C, Chen ST, Raghoebar GM, et al. Malpositioned osseointegrated implants relocated with segmental osteotomies: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter case series with a 1- to 15-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15(6): 836-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00444.x] [PMID: 22376067]
], in which segmental osteotomies were performed to move malpositioned osseointegrated implants to a more favourable position. The use of piezoelectric bone surgery presents significant advantages in this particular application. The micrometric cut leads to improved surgical control, allowing thin and precise osteotomies in the reduced space between adjacent roots [6Perfetti G, De Tullio I, Berardi D, Di Iorio D, Spoto G, Scarano A. Micromorphometrical and histological analyses using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2012; 26(2)(Suppl.): 81-8.
[PMID: 23164332]
, 7Stacchi C, Berton F, Turco G, et al. Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44(9): 1143-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.024] [PMID: 27527676]
]. The selective action on mineralized tissues of ultrasonic inserts permits to perform palatal cortical osteotomy without damaging the underlying periosteum of the undetached palatal flap, in order to preserve vascular support deriving from this side [4Cano J, Campo J, Bonilla E, Colmenero C. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Exp Dent 2012; 4(1): e54-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50642] [PMID: 24558526]
]. Moreover, recent studies highlighted enhanced bone healing after ultrasonic bone surgery in comparison with rotary instruments [9Preti G, Martinasso G, Peirone B, et al. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: A pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol 2007; 78(4): 716-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060285] [PMID: 17397320]
, 10Aimetti M, Ferrarotti F, Bergandi L, Saksing L, Parducci F, Romano F. Increase in periodontal interleukin-1β gene expression following osseous resective surgery using conventional rotary instruments compared with piezosurgery: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 36(4): 489-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.2835] [PMID: 27333006]
, 30Yang BE, Girod S. Efficacy of bone healing in calvarial defects using piezoelectric surgical instruments. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25(1): 149-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000382] [PMID: 24406569]
-32Troiano G, Inghingolo A, Serpico R, et al. Rate of relapse after enucleation of solid/multicystic ameloblastoma followed by piezoelectric or conventional peripheral ostectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29(3): e291-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004322] [PMID: 29419594]
].

The proposed modification of OBS protocol could facilitate the mobilization of dentoalveolar segments in comparison with the original OBS technique, in which the integrity of the palatal plate is maintained when performing mesial and distal osteotomies [17Bousquet P, Artz C, Renaud M, Canal P. Relocation of infrapositioned ankylosed teeth: Description of orthodontic bone stretching and case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(10): 1914-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.002] [PMID: 27371872]
]. Moreover, modified OBS preserves the apical vascular supply of the dentoalveolar segment, minimizing the risks of possible side effects inherent to the segmental osteotomies, such as loss of pulp vitality, avascular necrosis of the repositioned bone-tooth segment, marginal bone resorption and gingival recession [33Rodrigues DB, Wolford LM, Figueiredo LM, Adams GQ. Management of ankylosed maxillary canine with single-tooth osteotomy in conjunction with orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72(12): 2419.e1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.016] [PMID: 25266594]
].

Mesial and distal osteotomies improve the efficacy of orthodontic forces, which are applied immediately and continuously. After some days of traction, the stretching of the palatal plate allows the movement of the entire dento-alveolar segment, following Frost’s mechanostat hypothesis [34Frost HM. Perspectives: A proposed general model of the “mechanostat” (suggestions from a new skeletal-biologic paradigm). Anat Rec 1996; 244(2): 139-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199602)244:2<139::AID-AR1>3.0.CO;2-X] [PMID: 8808388]
]. In addition, both surgical trauma and orthodontic traction support the onset of the regional acceleratory phenomenon, characterized by the acceleration of normal cellular activities [2Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: A review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1983; 31(1): 3-9.
[PMID: 6345475]
]. Piezoelectric surgery, in particular, greatly increases spongious bone turnover and demineralization-remineralization dynamics, facilitating the movement of the osseous segment [35Sebaoun JD, Kantarci A, Turner JW, Carvalho RS, Van Dyke TE, Ferguson DJ. Modeling of trabecular bone and lamina dura following selective alveolar decortication in rats. J Periodontol 2008; 79(9): 1679-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080024] [PMID: 18771369]
-37Reside J, Everett E, Padilla R, et al. In vivo assessment of bone healing following Piezotome® ultrasonic instrumentation Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(2): 384-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12094] [PMID: 23763591]
].

However, the positive functional and esthetic outcomes reported in the present case report should be considered with caution: the efficacy of different treatment options for ankylosed permanent front teeth is still not supported in the literature by high-level evidence studies [38de Souza RF, Travess H, Newton T, Marchesan MA. Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (12): CD007820
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007820.pub3] [PMID: 26677103]
]. Further, well designed randomized clinical trials are necessary to draw conclusions and suggest guidelines for the management of these challenging clinical situations.

CONCLUSION

The proposed modification of OBS could facilitate ankylosed tooth repositioning in comparison with the original technique, where the palatal plate is not interrupted by mesial and distal osteotomies. Modified OBS preserves the apical vascular supply of the dentoalveolar segment, minimizing the risks of possible complications such as loss of pulp vitality, avascular necrosis of the repositioned bone-tooth segment, marginal bone resorption and gingival recession.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report, including accompanying images.

STANDARD FOR REPORTING

CARE guidelines and methodology were followed to conduct the study.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] Rekhi U, Catunda RQ, Gibson MP. Surgically accelerated orthodontic techniques and periodontal response: A systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2020.cjz103 Epub ahead of print
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz103] [PMID: 31942984]
[2] Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: A review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1983; 31(1): 3-9.
[PMID: 6345475]
[3] Lee W. Corticotomy for orthodontic tooth movement. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 44(6): 251-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.251] [PMID: 30637238]
[4] Cano J, Campo J, Bonilla E, Colmenero C. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Exp Dent 2012; 4(1): e54-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50642] [PMID: 24558526]
[5] Vercellotti T. Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: A case report--a new piezoelectric ridge expansion technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20(4): 358-65.
[PMID: 11203575]
[6] Perfetti G, De Tullio I, Berardi D, Di Iorio D, Spoto G, Scarano A. Micromorphometrical and histological analyses using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2012; 26(2)(Suppl.): 81-8.
[PMID: 23164332]
[7] Stacchi C, Berton F, Turco G, et al. Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44(9): 1143-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.024] [PMID: 27527676]
[8] Otake Y, Nakamura M, Henmi A, Takahashi T, Sasano Y. Experimental comparison of the performance of cutting bone and soft tissue between piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 17154.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35295-6] [PMID: 30464184]
[9] Preti G, Martinasso G, Peirone B, et al. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: A pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol 2007; 78(4): 716-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060285] [PMID: 17397320]
[10] Aimetti M, Ferrarotti F, Bergandi L, Saksing L, Parducci F, Romano F. Increase in periodontal interleukin-1β gene expression following osseous resective surgery using conventional rotary instruments compared with piezosurgery: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 36(4): 489-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.2835] [PMID: 27333006]
[11] Stacchi C, Vercellotti T, Toschetti A, Speroni S, Salgarello S, Di Lenarda R. Intraoperative complications during sinus floor elevation using two different ultrasonic approaches: A two-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(Suppl. 1): e117-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12136] [PMID: 23968289]
[12] Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Cusimano P, et al. Bone scrapers versus piezoelectric surgery in the lateral antrostomy for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28(5): 1191-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003636] [PMID: 28538071]
[13] Nordera P, Spanio di Spilimbergo S, Stenico A, Fornezza U, Volpin L, Padula E. The cutting-edge technique for safe osteotomies in craniofacial surgery: the piezosurgery bone scalpel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120(7): 1989-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000287328.56050.4e] [PMID: 18090764]
[14] Robiony M, Lazzarotto A, Nocini R, Costa F, Sembronio S, Franz L. Piezosurgery: ten years’ experience of percutaneous osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77(6): 1237-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.035] [PMID: 30802420]
[15] Vercellotti T, Stacchi C, Russo C, et al. Ultrasonic implant site preparation using piezosurgery: A multicenter case series study analyzing 3,579 implants with a 1- to 3-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014; 34(1): 11-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.1860] [PMID: 24396835]
[16] Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Baldi D, et al. Immediate loading of implant-supported single crowns after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BioMed Res Int 2018; 20186817154
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6817154] [PMID: 30186865]
[17] Bousquet P, Artz C, Renaud M, Canal P. Relocation of infrapositioned ankylosed teeth: Description of orthodontic bone stretching and case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(10): 1914-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.002] [PMID: 27371872]
[18] Sambataro S, Lorusso P, Caprioglio A, Franchi L, Cicciù M, Fastuca R. Changes of occlusal plane in growing patients with increased vertical dimension during class ii correction by using cervical headgear. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31(1): 172-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006197] [PMID: 31842074]
[19] Biederman W. The problem of the ankylosed tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1968; (Jul): 409-24.
[PMID: 5240770]
[20] Becker A, Abramovitz I, Chaushu S. Failure of treatment of impacted canines associated with invasive cervical root resorption. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(5): 870-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/090812-716.1] [PMID: 23343004]
[21] Vanarsdall RL. Correction of periodontal problems through orthodontic treatment.Orthodontics and periodontics 1985; 127-67.
[22] Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics 5th ed. 2012.
[23] Hwang DH, Park KH, Kwon YD, Kim SJ. Treatment of Class II open bite complicated by an ankylosed maxillary central incisor. Angle Orthod 2011; 81(4): 726-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/102010-578.1] [PMID: 21341998]
[24] Medeiros PJ, Bezerra AR. Treatment of an ankylosed central incisor by single-tooth dento-osseous osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112(5): 496-501.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70076-3] [PMID: 9387835]
[25] Kofod T, Würtz V, Melsen B. Treatment of an ankylosed central incisor by single tooth dento-osseous osteotomy and a simple distraction device. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(1): 72-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.020] [PMID: 15643418]
[26] Im JJ, Kye MK, Hwang KG, Park CJ. Miniscrew-anchored alveolar distraction for the treatment of the ankylosed maxillary central incisor. Dent Traumatol 2010; 26(3): 285-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00890.x] [PMID: 20572845]
[27] Stacchi C, Costantinides F, Biasotto M, Di Lenarda R. Relocation of a malpositioned maxillary implant with piezoelectric osteotomies: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28(5): 489-95.
[PMID: 18991000]
[28] Stacchi C, Bonino M, Di Lenarda R. Surgical relocation of a malpositioned, unserviceable implant protruding into the maxillary sinus cavity. A clinical report. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38(4): 417-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00107] [PMID: 20822469]
[29] Stacchi C, Chen ST, Raghoebar GM, et al. Malpositioned osseointegrated implants relocated with segmental osteotomies: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter case series with a 1- to 15-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15(6): 836-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00444.x] [PMID: 22376067]
[30] Yang BE, Girod S. Efficacy of bone healing in calvarial defects using piezoelectric surgical instruments. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25(1): 149-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000382] [PMID: 24406569]
[31] Zizzari VL, Berardi D, Congedi F, Tumedei M, Cataldi A, Perfetti G. Morphological aspect and iNOS and Bax expression modification in bone tissue around dental implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus conventional drill technique. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26(3): 741-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001540] [PMID: 25974783]
[32] Troiano G, Inghingolo A, Serpico R, et al. Rate of relapse after enucleation of solid/multicystic ameloblastoma followed by piezoelectric or conventional peripheral ostectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29(3): e291-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004322] [PMID: 29419594]
[33] Rodrigues DB, Wolford LM, Figueiredo LM, Adams GQ. Management of ankylosed maxillary canine with single-tooth osteotomy in conjunction with orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72(12): 2419.e1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.016] [PMID: 25266594]
[34] Frost HM. Perspectives: A proposed general model of the “mechanostat” (suggestions from a new skeletal-biologic paradigm). Anat Rec 1996; 244(2): 139-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199602)244:2<139::AID-AR1>3.0.CO;2-X] [PMID: 8808388]
[35] Sebaoun JD, Kantarci A, Turner JW, Carvalho RS, Van Dyke TE, Ferguson DJ. Modeling of trabecular bone and lamina dura following selective alveolar decortication in rats. J Periodontol 2008; 79(9): 1679-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080024] [PMID: 18771369]
[36] Dibart S, Yee C, Surmenian J, et al. Tissue response during Piezocision-assisted tooth movement: A histological study in rats. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36(4): 457-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt079] [PMID: 24253033]
[37] Reside J, Everett E, Padilla R, et al. In vivo assessment of bone healing following Piezotome® ultrasonic instrumentation Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(2): 384-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12094] [PMID: 23763591]
[38] de Souza RF, Travess H, Newton T, Marchesan MA. Interventions for treating traumatised ankylosed permanent front teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (12): CD007820
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007820.pub3] [PMID: 26677103]
Track Your Manuscript:


Endorsements



"Thank you for your magnificent and marvelous support throughout the publication stages. I would like to endorse my experience with you as a Junior Researcher and a recent graduate of the Dental school. Once again Thank you for your Great Help and Guidance throughout the stages of Publication. You guys are a great team and I am proud to be a Young Bentham author."


Asra Sabir Hussain
The University of Edinburgh Business School, UK

"My experience with Bentham Open was a valuable one because the quality of the services and analysis of my paper contributed in improving what we intended to convey to the readers."


José Ricardo Kina
Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic,
Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University
Brazil

"The Publication Manager was very cooperative and replied my mails and guided me without any delays; however the reviewing process was too long."


Mahtab Memarpour
Prevention of Oral and Dental Disease Research Center,
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry,
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz,
Iran


Browse Contents




Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.net
Copyright © 2020 Bentham Open