The Open Ophthalmology Journal




ISSN: 1874-3641 ― Volume 12, 2018
CLINICAL TRIAL STUDY

Use of Pressurized Air Infusion For Pre Descemet's Endothelial Keratoplasty (PDEK) - The Air Pump Assisted PDEK Technique



Soosan Jacob1, 2, *
1 Agarwal's Refractive and Cornea Foundation, Chennai, India
2 Agarwal's Eye Hospital, Chennai, India

Abstract

Purpose:

To assess the advantages offered by the air pump assisted PDEK technique that utilizes pressurized Anterior Chamber (AC) air infusion.

Methods:

Pressurized air infusion was provided through an anterior chamber maintainer connected to the fluid air exchange system of a posterior vitrectomy machine during surgery.

Results:

Pressurized air infusion within the AC helped perform Descemetorhexis, prevented bleeding during Peripheral Iridectomy (PI) and synechiolysis, prevented oozing of blood from peripheral corneal neovascularization into the AC and thus helped maintain a non-fibrinous AC environment. In addition, it helped in precise graft manipulation, centration, edge unfolding and unwrinkling after it was floated against the stroma as well as faster graft adhesion. It also prevented AC depth fluctuations during intra-cameral maneuvers and prevented intra-operative as well as post-operative graft detachment.

Conclusions:

This technique makes several steps of surgery easier and improves graft adhesion.

Keywords: PDEK, AC, Air pump, PI, Air infusion, DMEK.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2018
Volume: 12
Issue: Suppl-1, M6
First Page: 175
Last Page: 180
Publisher Id: TOOPHTJ-12-175
DOI: 10.2174/1874364101812010175

Article History:

Received Date: 8/9/2017
Revision Received Date: 24/5/2018
Acceptance Date: 11/6/2018
Electronic publication date: 23/7/2018
Collection year: 2018

Article Metrics:

CrossRef Citations:
0

Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 122
Abstract HTML Views: 117
PDF Downloads: 145
ePub Downloads: 142
Total Views/Downloads: 526

Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 73
Abstract HTML Views: 73
PDF Downloads: 46
ePub Downloads: 50
Total Views/Downloads: 242
Geographical View

© 2018 Soosan jacob.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the Agarwal's eye hospital and eye research centre 19, cathedral road, chennai-600086, india, Tel: +91 44 2811 6233, Fax: + 91 44 2811 5871, E-mail: dr_soosanj@hotmail.com




1. INTRODUCTION

As compared to Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) [1Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Standardized “no-touch” technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129(1): 88-94.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.334] [PMID: 21220634] , 2Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GRJ. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK-the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009; 20(4): 299-307.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832b8d18] [PMID: 19417653] ] Pre Descemet's Endothelial Keratoplasty (PDEK) [3Agarwal A, Dua HS, Narang P, et al. Pre-Descemet’s Endothelial Keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98(9): 1181-5.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304639] [PMID: 24659352] , 4Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang P, Kumar DA, Jacob S. Pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty with iinfant donor corneas: A prospective analysis. Cornea 2015; 34(8): 859-65.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000486] [PMID: 26057329] ] differs in providing the opportunity to use young donor corneas, thus potentially obtaining a larger quantum of cell transfer as well as younger and healthier cells. The splinting of the Descemet's Membrane (DM) and endothelium by the Pre Descemet's layer [5Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: A novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology 2013; 120(9): 1778-85.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018] [PMID: 23714320] ] gives the graft some rigidity. The Pre Descemet's layer also makes the PDEK graft resistant to tearing, thereby making it more easy to handle. However, unless appropriate techniques are followed, PDEK can still be challenging to perform and have a steep learning curve similar to DMEK [6Coster DJ, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams KA. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: A registry study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121(5): 979-87.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.017] [PMID: 24491643] -8Satué M, Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, Naveiras M, Cabrerizo J, Dapena I, Melles GR. Standardization of the descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty technique: Outcomes of the first 450 consecutive cases. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2015; 90(8): 356-64.[PMID: 25817960] ].

In order to facilitate easier surgery, the author has described a technique (air-pump assisted PDEK) utilizing infusion of pressurized air into the AC. This facilitates graft handling within the Anterior Chamber (AC) and makes the procedure comparable in ease to DSAEK [9Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006; 25(8): 886-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000214224.90743.01] [PMID: 17102661] , 10Busin M, Albé E. Does thickness matter: Ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014; 25(4): 312-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000071] [PMID: 24865169] ] while giving advantages of DMEK in terms of thickness of graft and lack of stroma. It also helps prevent a variety of complications ranging from inability to unfold the graft to complex Descemet's detachments [11Jacob S, Agarwal A, Chaudhry P, Narasimhan S, Chaudhry VN. A new clinico-tomographic classification and management algorithm for Descemet’s membrane detachment. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38(5): 327-33.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.012] [PMID: 25936569] ].

2. TECHNIQUE

Institutional review board approval was obtained and procedure confirmed to declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Washington, US).

2.1. Procedure for Peparation of Donor Graft

The corneo-scleral graft was placed endothelium side up on a flat surface. A 30 gauge needle mounted on a 5 ml syringe half filled with air was bent bevel-up and inserted into the scleral part of the rim close to the limbus. It was then moved forward superficially such that the bevel of the needle lay completely within the peripheral part of the donor cornea. Air was then injected quickly in order to create a type 1 big bubble. If required, the bubble was further expanded carefully using either air, storage medium or 0.1% Trypan blue (Blurhex, Senses Pharma, India) after moving the needle into the bubble space. A 15 degree blade was used to enter the bubble at the base and Trypan blue was injected into the space to stain the graft. The graft was then cut all around its base with a curved Vannas scissor held flat to obtain a PDEK graft. The graft was stored again in storage medium till further use.

2.2. Procedure Followed on Patient’s Eye

A 1 mm paracentesis incision was created tangentially such that the Anterior Chamber Maintainer (ACM) could be placed directed towards the angle rather than to the centre of the AC. The fluid air exchange system in a posterior vitrectomy system was used to provide pressurized air infusion into the AC through the ACM. Because of continuous leakage of air, especially when any instruments were passed through the incisions, air pressure on the gauge of the machine was adjusted to obtain slightly higher than physiological IOP within the anterior chamber as checked by finger pressure. A partial entry, either clear corneal or scleral tunnel was created using a 2.8 mm bevel up keratome. Under air, an inverse Descemetorhexis was performed using a reverse Sinskey hook. In cases with extensive and long standing bullous keratopathy with thickened DM and largely non-functional endothelium, the entire host DM was stripped. In eyes with early bullous keratopathy, the area of DM stripped was planned to be 1 mm larger than the PDEK graft size. Gross edge irregularities and DM tags were smoothened out by localized Descemet's stripping with the reverse Sinskey hook or a microforceps. Under air, a small inferior Peripheral Iridectomy (PI) was made using the vitrector at 400 cuts per second and vacuum of 200 mmHg. Air was replaced with BSS once any iris bleeding stopped and a bubble test was performed to assess stability of the air bubble in the AC. In cases with iris defects or where the air bubble was unstable and tended to migrate posterior to the iris, the ACM was connected to balanced salt solution and a pupilloplasty was performed to attain a stable iris IOL diaphragm as described by Jacob et al in 2014 [12Jacob S, Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Satish K. Modified technique for combining DMEK with glued intrascleral haptic fixation of a posterior chamber IOL as a single-stage procedure. J Refract Surg 2014; 30(7): 492-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140527-04] [PMID: 24892380] ]. The ACM was then removed, the graft was loaded into a micro incision lens injector and after verifying correct graft orientation within the cartridge using the E-PDEK/ E-DMEK technique [11Jacob S, Agarwal A, Chaudhry P, Narasimhan S, Chaudhry VN. A new clinico-tomographic classification and management algorithm for Descemet’s membrane detachment. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38(5): 327-33.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.012] [PMID: 25936569] , 13Jacob S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narasimhan S, Kumar DA, Sivagnanam S. Endoilluminator-assisted transcorneal illumination for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Enhanced intraoperative visualization of the graft in corneal decompensation secondary to pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40(8): 1332-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.019] [PMID: 25088633] ], the graft was injected into the AC. Again, using the endoilluminator assisted visualization, the graft was unrolled and then floated up by injecting air with a cannula. The ACM was reinserted carefully posterior to the graft and continuous air infusion restarted. The pressurized air infusion allowed clear visualization of the graft against the stroma. Under pressure of air, the reverse Sinskey hook was used to hold the PDEK graft at a single point in the periphery and the graft was pulled to centration within the Descemetorhexis. The main port was then sutured. Any folded graft edges, if present, were then unfolded gently in one movement using a reverse Sinskey hook to hold the fold at its centre and gently pulling it open. Repeated and multiple points of graft touch were avoided. Graft wrinkles if present, were also stretched out using the reverse Sinskey hook, holding the graft only at its extreme periphery. During these maneuvers, the graft was prevented from dislocating by continuous support from pressurized air infusion. In case of excessive graft movements while unfolding graft edges, the graft was brought to the desired position and pressure allowed to rise temporarily in order to allow the graft to adhere to overlying stroma, thereby decreasing excessive mobility. Unfolding was then proceeded with and any other required intra-ocular manoeuvres were also performed. Additional sutures were applied to the main port if required to get an air-tight AC. The ACM was finally removed and the limbal paracentesis also sutured. After loosening the speculum, air and BSS were used to bring the eye to normal Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) and to obtain a 90% air fill. Light perception was checked and the patient asked to maintain a supine position (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. (1)
A- Type I bubble dissected to form PDEK graft; B- Anterior Chamber Maintainer (ACM) connected to air pump is fixed and inferior peripheral PI performed with vitrector. Notice absence of bleeding because of air tamponade; C- Descemetorhexis performed under pressurized air infusion; D- E-PDEK technique used to enhance visualization of PDEK graft; E-Air infusion is stopped and air replaced with BSS. The PDEK graft injected into AC seen under microscope light; F- Graft unfolded and air injected to float it up. Notice small edge folds on the graft.


Fig. (2)
A, B The air pump is turned on again to get better air fill; The graft is centered into position and infolded peripheral graft edges are unfolded using a reverse Sinskey hook while the air acts as a third hand preventing the graft from dislocating; C- Any graft wrinkles are cleared. Continuing air infusion allows early graft adherence; D- 2 weeks post-operative appearance showing a clear graft.


3. RESULTS

12 patients were included in the study. Ten patients had pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, one patient had ICE syndrome, while one had viral endothelitis. All patients underwent underwent air pump assisted PDEK, 4 patients also required additional synechiolysis and three patients required pupilloplasty to reform the iris-IOL diaphgram. Continuous pressurized air infusion helped perform intra-operative steps and tamponaded any intra-ocular bleeding during PI and synechiolysis. Two patients had partial graft detachment. One was small and peripheral and reattached spontaneously while the other needed rebubbling on the slitlamp. All corneas were clear post-operatively. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Spectacle corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.13±0.13 to 0.62±0.31 post-operatively. Pre-operative donor specular microscopy was 3033±74 cells/mm2 and at 6 months was 1916±309 cells/mm2 (Fig. 2D and Table 1).

Table 1
Pre- and post-operative endothelial count after air pump assisted Pre-Descemet’s Endothelial Keratoplasty.


4. DISCUSSION

Graft handling, folds and wrinkles in the floated graft, edge folds and decentred graft are major intra-operative challenges for both PDEK and DMEK as is graft detachment post-operatively. The use of continuous pressurized air infusion makes PDEK easier by helping perform various steps in a reproducible manner. It thus makes PDEK an easier surgery to adopt and more repeatable.

Descemetorhexis initiated under an air bubble [14Mehta JS, Hantera MM, Tan DT. Modified air-assisted descemetorhexis for descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34(6): 889-91.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.01.037] [PMID: 18498990] -16Jacob S, Narasimhan S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, A i S. Air pump-assisted graft centration, graft edge unfolding, and graft uncreasing in young donor graft pre-descemet endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2017; 36(8): 1009-13.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001225] [PMID: 28481833] ] or continuous low pressure air infusion [15Güell JL, Morral M, Gris O, Elies D, Manero F. Bimanual technique for insertion and positioning of endothelium-descemet membrane graft in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2013; 32(12): 1521-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182933aee] [PMID: 24113369] ] allows the DM to be stripped against the overlying stroma making it easier and giving better visualization and control. Sizing and centration become easier and tags are less likely to form as well as better removed if formed. Continuous pressurized air infusion is used for further manoeuvres as well in our technique. Making a PI under air stops any iris bleeding. Synechiolysis if required is also done under air, preventing blood in the anterior chamber as well as preventing a fibrinous microenvironment which can make graft manipulation difficult as well as increase post-operative inflammation and interface debris. Viscoelastic usage that can potentially interfere with graft adhesion can also therefore be avoided completely for both PI as well as synechiolysis. Use of continuous air also prevents blood from seeping into the AC in cases with peripheral corneal neovascularization secondary to long standing corneal edema.

The air-pump assisted PDEK technique is more forgiving with respect to graft edge folds and decentration as the sturdy nature of the graft allows these to be adjusted once the graft is floated up against the stroma. The graft can therefore be floated earlier without having to ensure perfect centration or an edge-to-edge unfolded graft unlike in DMEK. A third hand effect is obtained that prevents AC depth fluctuations and the graft is prevented from detaching by the air pressure during various manoeuvres. Graft centration and unfolding of edge folds therefore becomes easier.16 This is especially important as young donor grafts can scroll tighter and increased manipulation may be required if attempting to unfold the graft completely before floatation, sometimes still resulting in unsuccessful edge-to-edge unscrolling. Increasing graft manipulation can result in increased cell loss. Air pump assisted PDEK is therefore helpful in allowing earlier flotation of graft followed by handling of graft edge folds, wrinkles and creases with a reverse Sinskey hook after floatation. Care should however be taken to avoid repeated, rough or large areas of graft touch with the reverse Sinskey hook which can increase endothelial cell loss. In our cases, we found graft edge unfolding easy to perform under pressurized air infusion once some graft adhesion had initiated and it was generally possible with single touch points, only at the extreme edges of the graft. Care should however be taken to ensure graft centration before graft adhesion initiates as this may become difficult later. Though similar manoeuvres may be performed in DMEK with very low infusion pressures, in our experience, DMEK grafts had a higher rate of graft wrinkling and graft edge tearing because of the thinner and more fragile nature of the graft. Hence this technique, if used, should be performed only with great caution in DMEK.

Pressurized air infusion also allows adequate operating space within the AC that allows easy insertion of instruments without causing damage to the graft endothelium. The set infusion pressure on the machine does not equate to the intra-cameral pressure achieved because of continuous leakage through the incisions. The infusion pressure on the machine is therefore set to achieve a slightly higher than physiological intra-cameral pressure estimated clinically by gently indenting the cornea. This slightly higher air pressure within the AC also allows earlier and better graft adherence

One of the disadvantages of this study was the absence of comparison with a control group where pressurized air infusion was not used. Future, randomized, comparative studies assessing long term endothelial cell loss between these two groups is therefore desirable. Further studies are also required on the duration of the pressure rise and the quantum of pressure rise required in different patient scenarios and correlating this with endothelial counts.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, air pump assisted PDEK increases the ease, rapidity and success of surgery while decreasing complications and acting as a third hand within the AC to stabilize the graft for certain important manoeuvres. Addition of this newer technique will help the learning surgeon to perform the surgery with greater ease and confidence while also helping the established surgeon.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No Animals were used in this research. All human research procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Standardized “no-touch” technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129(1): 88-94.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.334] [PMID: 21220634]
[2] Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GRJ. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK-the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009; 20(4): 299-307.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832b8d18] [PMID: 19417653]
[3] Agarwal A, Dua HS, Narang P, et al. Pre-Descemet’s Endothelial Keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98(9): 1181-5.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304639] [PMID: 24659352]
[4] Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang P, Kumar DA, Jacob S. Pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty with iinfant donor corneas: A prospective analysis. Cornea 2015; 34(8): 859-65.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000486] [PMID: 26057329]
[5] Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: A novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology 2013; 120(9): 1778-85.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018] [PMID: 23714320]
[6] Coster DJ, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams KA. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: A registry study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121(5): 979-87.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.017] [PMID: 24491643]
[7] Monnereau C, Quilendrino R, Dapena I, et al. Multicenter study of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: First case series of 18 surgeons. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132(10): 1192-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1710] [PMID: 24993643]
[8] Satué M, Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, Naveiras M, Cabrerizo J, Dapena I, Melles GR. Standardization of the descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty technique: Outcomes of the first 450 consecutive cases. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2015; 90(8): 356-64.[PMID: 25817960]
[9] Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006; 25(8): 886-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000214224.90743.01] [PMID: 17102661]
[10] Busin M, Albé E. Does thickness matter: Ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014; 25(4): 312-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000071] [PMID: 24865169]
[11] Jacob S, Agarwal A, Chaudhry P, Narasimhan S, Chaudhry VN. A new clinico-tomographic classification and management algorithm for Descemet’s membrane detachment. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38(5): 327-33.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.012] [PMID: 25936569]
[12] Jacob S, Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Satish K. Modified technique for combining DMEK with glued intrascleral haptic fixation of a posterior chamber IOL as a single-stage procedure. J Refract Surg 2014; 30(7): 492-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140527-04] [PMID: 24892380]
[13] Jacob S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narasimhan S, Kumar DA, Sivagnanam S. Endoilluminator-assisted transcorneal illumination for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Enhanced intraoperative visualization of the graft in corneal decompensation secondary to pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40(8): 1332-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.019] [PMID: 25088633]
[14] Mehta JS, Hantera MM, Tan DT. Modified air-assisted descemetorhexis for descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34(6): 889-91.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.01.037] [PMID: 18498990]
[15] Güell JL, Morral M, Gris O, Elies D, Manero F. Bimanual technique for insertion and positioning of endothelium-descemet membrane graft in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2013; 32(12): 1521-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182933aee] [PMID: 24113369]
[16] Jacob S, Narasimhan S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, A i S. Air pump-assisted graft centration, graft edge unfolding, and graft uncreasing in young donor graft pre-descemet endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2017; 36(8): 1009-13.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001225] [PMID: 28481833]

Endorsements



"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."


Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."


Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."


Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."


Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."


Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."


Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."


Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."


J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."


Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."


Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."


Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."


Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."


Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."


M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."


Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."


Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."


Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."


Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."


Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."


Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)


Browse Contents


Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.com
Copyright © 2018 Bentham Open