The Open Clinical Cancer Journal


ISSN: 1874-1894 ― Volume 5, 2011

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: The Role of Cell Cycle Genes in the Different Histotypes

Giuseppina D’Andrilli2, Antonio Giordano2, 3, Alessandro Bovicelli*, 1, 2
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant’Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
2 Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Dept. of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
3 Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy


Cancer is frequently considered to be a disease of the cell cycle; alterations in different families of cell cycle regulators cooperate in tumor development. Molecular analysis of human tumors has shown that cell cycle regulators are frequently mutated in human neoplasms, which underscores how important the maintenance of cell cycle commitment is in the prevention of human cancer. The regulatory pathways controlling cell cycle phases include several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes which display a range of abnormalities with potential usefulness as markers of evolution or treatment response in epithelial ovarian cancer. This review summarizes the current knowledge about these aberrations in malignant tumors of the ovary. We sought to focus our attention on the genes involved in the development of tumors arising from the ovarian epithelium, which are the most common types of ovarian malignancies.

Keywords: Cell cycle deregulation, ovarian malignancy, cancer therapy, ovarian carcinoma histotypes..

Article Information

Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2008
Volume: 2
First Page: 7
Last Page: 12
Publisher Id: TOCCJ-2-7
DOI: 10.2174/1874189400802010007

Article History:

Received Date: 7/1/2008
Revision Received Date: 14/1/2008
Acceptance Date: 22/1/2008
Electronic publication date: 6/2/2008
Collection year: 2008

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License(, which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant’Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy; Tel: 051-399520; Fax: 051-304751; E-mail:


Ovarian cancer remains a highly lethal disease. In devel- oped countries, ovarian cancer accounts for more deaths than all other gynecological malignancies combined; an estimated 22,430 new cases and 15,280 deaths occurred in 2007 (Can- cer Facts & Figures 2007). As the result of advances in sur- gical management and chemotherapeutic options over the last three decades, the median survival times for ovarian cancer patients has improved. However, overall survival has not been significantly changed. In addition, most patients present with advanced disease for which highly effective curative therapy is currently unavailable. The epithelial tu- mors of the ovary, which account for 90% of malignant ovarian tumors, are further divided into histological sub- groups with different malignant potential endometrioid, mucinous, serous, clear cell and undifferentiated carcinomas. In follow-up studies, mucinous and endometrioid carcinomas have a less aggressive behavior and a better overall survival than serous tumors. A characteristic of serous, mucinous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas is the low malignant po- tential (LMP), or in the case of borderline tumors, a low risk of invasion.

The molecular pathology of ovarian carcinomas is het- erogeneous and involves various putative precursor lesions and multiple pathways of development. The most common subtype, high-grade serous carcinoma, is characterized by p53 mutations, and BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 dysfunction. It most likely arises from epithelium within inclusion cysts or from the surface of the ovary. Dysregulation of cell cycle control, in particular G1-S-phase transition, is implicated in the pathogenesis of most human cancers, including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, the prognostic significance of aberrant cell cycle gene expression in EOC remains mostly unclear. During the G1-S transition, the cy- clinE/CDK2 and cyclinD/CDK4 complexes promote pro- gression and are each inhibited by the associated CDK in- hibitor p27KIP1. If DNA damage occurs, p53 accumulates in the cells and induces the p21-mediated inhibition of cy- clinD/CDK. The transition to S phase is triggered by the activation of the cyclinD/CDK complex, which phosphory- lates the retinoblastoma protein pRb, a known cell prolifera-tion regulator.

The members of the INK4 family, comprising p16 and p15, exert their inhibitory activity by binding to the CDK4 and CDK6 kinases and preventing their association with D- type cyclins. In contrast to G1 regulators, less is known about the genes which regulate the S, G2 and M phases of the cell cy- cle, such as cyclin A- and cyclin B-kinase complexes and their inhibitors. The significance of cell-cycle regulatory genes in carcinogenesis is underlined by the fact that most of them have been identified as proto-oncogenes or tumor sup- pressor genes.

Expression of cell cycle markers has recently been linked to tumor behavior and response to treatment. Hopefully, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underly- ing the tumorigenic process of ovarian carcinoma will lead to earlier diagnosis, novel therapies and ultimately better outcomes.


Ovarian serous carcinoma is the most common and lethal type of ovarian cancer and its molecular etiology remains poorly understood. The expression of selected genes from the pRb pathway that regulates G1-S-phase progression, in-cluding cyclin D1, p16INK4A, cyclin E, p27KIP1, p21WAF1/CIP1, and p53, was examined in a consecutive series of 134 serous epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) using immunohistochemis- try. Molecular markers predictive of reduced overall survival in univariate analysis were overexpression of cyclin D1 (P = 0.03) and p53 (P = 0.03) and reduced expression of p27KIP1 (P= 0.05) and p21WAF1/CIP1 (P = 0.02), with the latter three also being prognostic for a shorter progression-free interval. In addition, patients displaying overexpression of p53 with concurrent loss of p21WAF1/CIP1 had a significantly shorter overall (P=0.0008) and progression-free survival (P=0.0001). On multivariate analysis, overexpression of cyclin D1 and combined loss of p21WAF1/CIP1 in the presence of p53 overex- pression were independent predictors of overall survival. Similarly, the combination of p21WAF1/CIP1 loss and p53 over- expression was independently predictive of a shorter pro- gression-free interval. Overexpression of p53 and cyclin E and reduced expression of p27KIP1 and p21WAF1/CIP1 were sig- nificantly associated with increasing tumor grade. This study confirms that dysregulation of cell cycle genes is common in EOC, and that aberrant expression of critical cell cycle regu- latory proteins can predict patient outcome in serous EOC [1].

Buchynska et al. have shown that serous ovarian carci- nomas are characterized by high proliferative activity (PI Ki- 67 = 30.0 +/- 0.3%), p53 and p16INK4A overexpression and low expression of p21WAF1/CIP1. The association between ex-pression of these markers and ovarian tumor grade was de- fined: the maximal level of Ki-67, p53 and p16INK4A and minimal of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression were observed in G3 tu- mors. So, low p21WAF1/CIP1 expression combined with p16INK4A overexpression is considered to be a factor for a poor prognosis in serous ovarian cancer [2].

Reduced expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase in- hibitor p27KIP1 has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis in several human cancers. In serous ovarian can- cers, positive p27KIP1 staining rate was significantly higher in early stage than that in advanced stage diseases (p=0.030, Fisher's exact test). Log-rank testing showed that negative p27KIP1 expression significantly correlates with poor survival in serous ovarian cancer patients (p=0.041). These results suggest that the underexpression of p27KIP1 caused by post- translational mechanism may contribute to the development and progression and result in poor prognosis of serous ovar- ian cancers [3].

It is well known that somatic mutation of p53 represents the most common molecular genetic alteration occurring in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Inactivation of p53 was de- tected in 30-80% of ovarian carcinoma [4, 5].

Although p53 overexpression was a common feature of both mucinous and serous borderline tumors, p21WAF1/CIP1 overexpression appeared specific to serous tumors [6].

Statistical analyses showed a significantly higher expres- sion of p53 in histologically high-grade tumors (grades 2 and 3), mainly of the serous subtyp. A statistical tendency toward higher expression of p53 in older patients (P= 0.08) was also observed. p53 is associated with serous carcinoma, loss of differentiation, and older patients. These results are in keep- ing with different pathogenetic pathways in subtypes of ovarian carcinoma, prompting the search for new strategies of prevention and treatment [7].

The frequency of p53 mutation in early-stage ovarian carcinomas of serous histology is comparable to that re- ported for advanced-stage tumors, and it is therefore likely to occur early in the progression of the most common his- tological variant of ovarian carcinoma [8]. For invasive car- cinomas, the rate of mutation and expression increases with increasing tumor grade and stage, and is more common in tumors of serous histology [9]. Palazzo et al. demonstrated that coexpression of p21WAF1/CIP1 and MDM2 characterizes serous borderline tumors of the ovary and their implants, which suggests that these cell cycle control proteins are im- portant in these tumors and may be related to tumor progres- sion. Low expression of p53 protein in serous borderline tumors might be in part mediated by MDM2. This suggests that the p53 pathway is intact in most of these tumors, in contrast with carcinomas, in which high expression of p53 has been related to mutations of this gene [10].


Mucinous carcinoma of the ovary accounts for 7% to 14% of all primary EOC [11]. Distinction of primary ovarian epithelial tumors from metastatic adenocarcinomas is chal- lenging for tumors exhibiting mucinous, endometrioid, or mixed endometrioid/mucinous differentiation. Metastatic carcinomas with these types of differentiation can be derived from several sites, including the gastrointestinal tract and the uterus. Most endocervical adenocarcinomas exhibit muci- nous and/or endometrioid differentiation; they infrequently metastasize to the ovaries but may simulate primary ovarian tumors (both borderline and carcinoma). Most are high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related and demonstrate dif- fuse p16 over-expression due to complex molecular mecha- nisms by which high-risk HPV transforming proteins interact with cell cycle regulatory proteins. Vang et al. evaluated this expression pattern for identifying metastatic endocervical adenocarcinomas in the ovaries among primary ovarian tu- mors and other metastatic adenocarcinomas having muci- nous and/or endometrioid/endometrioidlike differentiation. Immunohistochemical expression of p16 was assessed in 195 tumors, including 102 primary ovarian tumors (51 mucinous, 47 endometrioid, and 4 mixed mucinous-endometrioid tu- mors), 82 metastatic adenocarcinomas of known primary sites (colorectum: 34, endocervix: 19, pancreaticobiliary tract: 17, appendix: 7, stomach: 5), 11 metastatic adenocarci- nomas of unknown origin, and 4 adenocarcinomas of uncer- tain origin. Mean and median p16 expression values for HPV-positive endocervical adenocarcinomas were substan- tially higher than those for primary ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors, HPV-unrelated endocervical adenocar- cinomas, metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin, and adenocarcinomas of uncertain (primary ovarian vs. me- tastatic) origin. Only the 15 HPV-positive endocervical ade- nocarcinomas and 6 other tumors had values of 80% or greater. Diffuse (>75% positive tumor cells), moderate to strong p16 expression is a sensitive (100%) and specific (97%) marker for identifying HPV-related endocervical ade- nocarcinomas metastatic to the ovary among the primary ovarian tumors and metastatic adenocarcinomas from other sites that are in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors having mucinous and/or endometrioid/endometrioidlike dif- ferentiation. p16 is useful as part of a panel of immunohisto- chemical markers for distinguishing primary ovarian tumors from metastases and, when diffusely positive, can suggest the cervix as a potential primary site for metastatic adenocar- cinomas of unknown origin [12].

Patients with advanced mucinous EOC have a poorer response to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy com- pared with patients with other histologicsubtypes of EOC, and their survival is worse. Specific alternative therapeutic approaches should be sought for this group of patients,per- haps involving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy [13].


Plisiecka-Halasa et al. evaluated the clinical and biologi- cal significance of p21WAF1/CIP1, p27KIP1, c-myc, p53 and Ki67 expressions in ovarian cancer patients. Immunohisto- chemical analysis was performed on 204 ovarian carcinomas of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB to IV treated with platinum-based chemo- therapy. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas differed from other carcinomas by having a low incidence of p53 accumulation, a high incidence of c-myc overexpression (70%) and a low median Ki67 labeling index (LI) (all with P <0.001). The authors have shown an independent predictive value of p21WAF1/CIP1 LI in ovarian carcinoma patients. The prognostic value of p21WAF1/CIP1 and p21WAF1/CIP1 plus p27KIP1 LI was determined by p53(-) status. A high frequency of c- myc overexpression in endometrioid and clear cell carcino- mas may suggest its role in the development of these tumor types [14]. High-level p16 expression was observed in se- rous and endometrioid phenotypes, with a positive relation to high levels of both cell proliferation and p53 abnormalities. None of 131 cases analyzed by Saegusa et al. showed a methylation status of the p16 gene promoter [15]. Two dif-ferent studies also revealed no evidence of methylation and low levels of mutations [16] [17]. However there are some data supporting p16 promoter hypermethylation as a mecha-nism underlying the downregulation of the gene. Milde-Langosch et al. found hypermethylation in 12/19 negative cases, most of them mucinous and endometrioid carcinomas [18]. Alterations in p15 were observed in serous, endo-metrioid and clear cell but not in mucinous carcinomas, sug-gesting that inactivation of p15 may be the histological type-specific event in ovarian tumorigenesis [19].


Ovarian clear cell carcinoma revealed significantly in-creased cyclin E associated with an increase in p21WAF1/CIP1, compared to the other histological subtypes [20].

Clear cell carcinoma revealed such trends as low expres- sion of both p53 and cyclin A and significantly increased expression of both p21WAF1/CIP1 and cyclin E compared with the other histologic subtypes. In all ovarian carcinomas, a very strong positive correlation between p53 positive stain-ing and cyclin A positive staining and a weak positive corre-lation between p21WAF1/CIP1 positive staining and cyclin E positive staining were recognized at the level of expression of cell cycle regulatory molecules. Clinical stage was the only independent predictive factor for the survival of the patients. Among ovarian adenocarcinomas, clear cell carci-noma exhibits a unique pattern of expression of cell cycle regulatory molecules, though in this study the survival did not correlate with histologic subtype, only with clinical stage [20].

Cyclin E expression is significantly higher in clear cell carcinoma than in serous carcinoma and is significantly re- lated with p53 positivity [21].

Akahane et al. demonstrated that some genetic altera- tions, which induce p53 mutations in endometriosis, may affect malignant transformation of endometriosis into ovar- ian clear cell carcinoma [22].


The molecular changes in undifferentiated carcinomas of the ovary remain largely unknown [23].

In a recent study carried out by Rosen et al. overexpres- sion of cyclin E was found in 63.2% of the 405 primary ovarian carcinomas analyzed and was associated with clear cell, undifferentiated, and serous carcinoma (P < or = .001), high-grade tumors (P < or = .001), late-stage disease (P = .002), age older than 60 years at the time of diagnosis (P = .04), and suboptimal cytoreduction (P = .001). A high per- centage of cyclin E-expressing cells was associated with a poor outcome in univariate and in multivariate analyses. In addition, cyclin E levels also reduced survival in the late- stage disease group and in patients who underwent subopti- mal debulking. Cyclin E was identified as an independent prognostic factor in patients with ovarian carcinoma. The accumulation of cyclin E protein may be a late event in tu- morigenesis and may contribute to disease progression in these patients [24]


The identified molecular changes in epithelial ovarian cancers can facilitate the rational development of new diag- nostic modalities and tailored therapies for these malignan- cies. Most of the G1-S regulators play an important role in ovarian cancer due to the fact that they control the G1-S tran- sition, a crucial step in cell cycle control. Cyclin E is a key regulator of the G1-S transition. Abnormalities in cyclin E expression have been related to survival in a variety of can- cers. Cyclin E plays an important role in ovarian carcino- genesis of clear cell, undifferentiated, and serous carcinomas and its overexpression may be an indicator of a poor progno- sis. Cyclin E expression is significantly higher in clear cell carcinoma than in serous carcinoma and is significantly re- lated with p53 positivity. Overexpression of cyclin E was also found to be associated with undifferentiated carcinomas of the ovary. The actual mutation of p53 is the most common molecular alteration occurring in both early-stage and inva- sive ovarian carcinomas, especially in those of serous histol- ogy, and confers resistance to chemotherapy and lead to shortened overall survival. Epithelial ovarian tumors show- ing p53 alterations are significantly less sensitive to chemo- therapy and more aggressive than those with functional p53 and overall survival is shortened in patients with p53 muta- tions [25, 26]. In serous carcinomas the combination of p21WAF1/CIP1 loss and p53 overexpression was independently predictive of a shorter progression-free interval. Coexpres- sion of p21WAF1/CIP1 and MDM2 characterizes serous border- line tumors of the ovary and their implants, which suggests that these cell cycle control proteins are important in these tumors and may be related to tumor progression. Low p21WAF1/CIP1 expression combined with p16 overexpression is considered to be the indicator for a poor prognosis in serous ovarian cancer.

Mucinous and endometrioid carcinomas are largely char- acterized by p16 downregulation and the gene promoter hypermethylation. Lack of p16 is associated with p53 wt (wild type) and is typical of mucinous and endometrioid tumors. Little is known about the role of p15 in ovarian carcinomas. No mutations have been detected. Its inactivation may be the histological type-specific event in ovarian tumorigenesis. Alterations in p15 gene occur in serous, endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas but not in mucinous carcinomas. There are also a number of studies reporting no correlation between the expression of cell cycle genes and the different histotypes of ovarian carcinoma.

In fact, cyclin D1 and c-Myc which are key participants in the cell-cycle pathway are frequently overexpressed in epithelial ovarian carcinomas, but they are not correlated with a particular histologic subtype [27] and p27KIP1 subcel- lular location in the cytoplasmwas independently associated with poorer survival among womenwith ovarian carcinoma, particularly for those with late-stagedisease and regardless of tumor histotype [28].

The described abnormalities of cell cycle regulators in ovarian carcinomas (Fig. 1) suggest that most of the cell cy- cle regulatory genes play a crucial role in ovarian carcinoma tumorigenesis and/or development. The main goal in cancer therapy remains an early diagnosis of the disease, and some of the cell cycle genes described could be useful markers for achieving this goal, and therefore more targeted therapies.

Fig. (1)

Schematic model of cell cycle regulator genes involved in carcinogenesis of the different histotypes in epithelial ovarian cancer. The question mark in the undifferentiated tumor section underlines that the role of cell cycle genes in this histotype of ovarian cancer is largely unknown.



Tumor suppressor genes.


Family of genes involved in the progression of cells through the cell cycle.

Cyclin E

Gene that regulates cell cycle. Cyclin E is one of the key regulators of the G1/S transition in the cell cycle. Cyclin E binds to G1 phase Cdk2, which is required for the transition from G1 to S phase.

Cyclin D Family

Family of three closely related genes termed cyclin D1, D2 and D3 that are expressed in an overlapping redundant fashion in all proliferating cell types and collectively control the progression of cells through the cell cycle.

Cyclin D1

Gene that belongs to Cyclin D family of genes which function as the regulatory subunits of cyclin/cyclin depend- ent kinase (Cdk) holoenzymes that regulate entry into and progression through the cell cycle.

CDK 2 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2)

Gene that regulates cell cycle. CDK2 is a member of a large family of protein kinases that initiates the principal transitions of the eukaryotic cell cycle.

CDK4 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4)

Gene that regulates cell cycle. The complexes formed by CDK4 and the D-type cyclins are involved in the control of cell proliferation during the G1 phase. CDK4 is inhibited by


CDK 6 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6)

Gene that regulates cell cycle. The activity of this kinase first appears in mid-G1 phase, which is controlled by the regulatory subunits including D-type cyclins and members of INK4 family of CDK inhibitors. This kinase, as well as CDK4, has been shown to phosphorylate, and thus regulate the activity of tumor suppressor protein pRb.

Cyclin A

Gene that regulates cell cycle. Cyclin A binds to S phase Cdk2 and is required for the cell to progress through the S phase of cell cycle.

Cyclin B

Gene that regulates cell cycle. Cyclin B is a mitotic cy- clin. The amount of cyclin B (which binds to Cdk1) and the activity of the cyclin B-Cdk complex rise through the cell cycle until mitosis, where they fall abruptly due to degrada-tion. c-myc Oncogene overexpressed in a wide range of human can- cers.

INK4 Family

Family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors.


Gene associated with cell proliferation.


Target gene of the transcription factor tumor gene p53; its overexpression inhibits p53 gene.


Tumor suppressor gene.


Tumor suppressor gene. p27KIP1 belongs to the family of cell cycle regulators called cyclin-dependent kinase inhibi- tors (CDKI), which bind to "cyclin-CDK" complexes and cause cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase.


Tumor suppressor gene. This gene encodes a potent cy- clin-dependent kinase inhibitor. The encoded protein binds to and inhibits the activity of cyclin-CDK2 or -CDK4 com- plexes, and thus functions as a regulator of cell cycle pro-gression at G1. The expression of this gene is tightly con- trolled by the tumor suppressor protein p53, through which this protein mediates the p53-dependent cell cycle G1 phase arrest in response to a variety of stress stimuli.

Rb (Retinoblastoma Gene)

Tumor suppressor gene. Rb prevents the cell from repli- cating damaged DNA by preventing its progression through the cell cycle into its S (synthesis phase) or progressing through G1 (first gap phase).

pRb (Retinoblastoma Protein) Pathway

The pRb pathway plays a key role in controlling the G1/S transition in cell cycle progression.


Gene that belongs to INK4 gene family. p16 is a tumor suppressor gene.


Gene that belongs to INK4 gene family. p15INK4b is a specific inhibitor of cdk4/cdk6 and is periodically expressed during cell cycle.


Track Your Manuscript:


"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."

Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."

Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."

Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."

Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."

Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."

Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."

Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."

J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."

Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."

Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."

Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."

Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."

Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."

M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."

Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."

Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."

Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."

Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."

Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."

Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)

Browse Contents

Webmaster Contact:
Copyright © 2020 Bentham Open