The Open Drug Safety Journal


ISSN: 1876-8180 ― Volume 4, 2013

Manganese Based MR Contrast Agents: Formulation and Clinical Applications

Elizaveta Chabanova*, Vibeke B Logager, Jakob M Moller , Henrik S Thomsen
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark


This paper discusses the development and clinical applications of positive manganese based MR contrast agents, including both intrave¬nous (i.v.) and oral formulations. The i.v. formulation is a manganese–dipyridoxyl diphosphate chelate which is commer¬c¬ially available; whereas the oral formulation is a mixture of MnCl2, alanine and Vitamin D3, which is currently under clinical trials. The compositions, preclinical studies and pharmacokinetics of both form¬ulations are discussed. The main reported clinical difference between the two formulations is that i.v. administration exposes all the organs, whereas oral ingestion exposes only the enterohepatic circulation. Manganese based MR contrast agents are particularly suitable for detection of focal liver lesions due to their uptake by the mito¬chondria rich hepatocytes, and biliary delineation due to their biliary excretion; it can provide useful information in diffuse liver lesions. Further, the i.v. formulation can be used for focal pancreatic lesions.

Keywords: Manganese, metabolism, Mangafodipir, CMC-001, positive contrast agent, liver, gallbladder, biliary tree, cancer, metastases, cirrhosis, pancreas, chemotherapy.

Article Information

Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2011
Volume: 2
First Page: 29
Last Page: 38
Publisher Id: TODSJ-2-29
DOI: 10.2174/1876818001102010029

Article History:

Received Date: 01/10/2010
Revision Received Date: 24/1/2011
Acceptance Date: 31/1/2011
Electronic publication date: 11/03/2011
Collection year: 2011

© Chabanova et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Department of Diagnostic Radiology 54E2, Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, DK-2730, Denmark; Tel: +45 44884390; Fax: +45 44910480; E-mail:


Manganese (Mn2+) is an essential trace element that plays an important role in various aspects of metabolism in humans, animals, plants and microorganisms [1]. In man, the normal whole body content of Mn is 220–360 µmol, with a daily turn over of 90–140 µmol, and up to 25% stored in the skeleton which is not readily accessible. The highest concentrations of manganese are found in the liver (22–38 µmol/kg) and pancreas, and lesser quantities in kidneys (11–16 µmol/kg). Manganese is interchangeable with other ions such as cobalt, zinc and nickel in the activation of enzymes.

Manganese is also a cofactor in a variety of enzymes including pyruvate carboxylase, superoxide dismutase, glutamine synthetase and alkaline phosphates. Therefore it is involved in oxidation–reduction processes, phosphorylation, fermentation, and in the synthesis of cholesterol, fatty acids and mucopolysaccharides. Manganese is also present in many intracellular organelles, especially mitochondria, where it has an important metabolic function as a coenzyme in protein synthesis.

The main route of manganese absorption is the gastrointestinal tract, but in man, rats and mice less than 5% of the oral intake is absorbed. In contrast to many other minerals in the body, manganese is actively excreted via hepatocytes into the bile, and only minimal amounts are excreted via the kidney.

When used as a contrast agent, manganese ion (Mn2+) belongs to the same group of paramagnetic ions as gadolinium (Gd3+) and copper (Cu2+), which are capable of shortening the T1 of water protons, thus increasing the signal intensity of T1 weighted (T1w) Magnetic Resonance (MR) images; but manganese has also a minor T2 effect which reduces the signal intensity [2-10]. Biologically manganese is involved in mitochondrial function of cells, and thus the more mitochondria in the tissue, the higher its uptake. As hepatocytes are rich in mitochondria, Mn2+ is an excellent contrast agent for MR imaging of the liver and other mitochondria rich organs like pancreas and kidneys.

This article discusses the development and use of both intravenous (i.v.) and oral manganese based contrast agents, including their formulation, preclinical evaluations, pharmacokinetics and clinical applications.


Manganese based MR contrast agents are used in two forms:

Intravenous formulation: Mangafodipir trisodium, manganese–dipyridoxyl diphosphate chelate (MnDPDP manganese-5, 5’-bis(phosphate) sodium salt, which is commercially available and used for slow injection (in Europe) or bolus injection (in the US).

Oral formulation: A mixture of MnCl2, alanine and vitamin D3, designated as CMC-001, and is currently undergoing phase 3 clinical trial for oral intake.

Following i.v. injection, manganese ion accumulates in the liver, bile, pancreas, kidneys and cardiac muscle [11, 12], but following oral intake, it accumulates only in the liver and bile [9]. The orally administered manganese formulation overcomes such problems as the cumbersome i.v. administration and exposure of total body to Mn2+. Oral ingestion of CMC-001 also results in higher visualization due to its higher accumulation in the liver and bile. Fig. (1) shows the uptake of manganese by hepatocytes leading to higher signal intensity, whereas metastasis remains hypointense.

Fig. (1)

Computed tomography (CT) (A) and MR liver images (B) of a 52-year old female with bladder cancer. CMC-001 enhanced MRI shows multiple metastases relatively to CT (adapted from [16]).

Intravenous Manganese MR Contrast Agent: Mangafodipir Trisodium

Mangafodipir trisodium (formerly known as Mn-DPDP, Teslacan, GE Healthcare) (Fig. 2), is a paramagnetic agent developed as an MR contrast material for the hepatobiliary system.

Fig. (2)

Chemical structure and molecular model of Manganese– dipyridoxyl diphosphate chelate (MnDPDP), known as Mangafodipir manganese-5,5’-bis(phosphate) sodium salt.

The large linear ligand dipyridoxyl diphosphate (DPDP) is a vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) analog; it reduces the acute i.v. toxicity of free Mn2+ [13, 14]. The metal chelate has a net electric charge of 3, resulting from the 2+ charge of the manganese ion and the 5 charge of DPDP, counterbalanced by the presence of three sodium ions in the solution. Following i.v. administration, Mangafodipir trisodium is metabolized by dephosphorylation to Mn–dipyridoxyl monophosphate (Mn-DPMP) and Mn–dipyridoxyl-ethylenediamine-diacetate (Mn-PLED), and also transmetallated by zinc to the corresponding zinc compounds.

Biodistribution studies of Mangafodipir in rats [15] have shown that at 30 min after i.v. injection, 13% of the paramagnetic agent and its metabolites are present in the liver, 9% in small intestine, 3% in blood, 1.3% in kidneys, and less than 1% in other organs. In rats, fecal excretion amounts to 47% and renal elimination to 43% after 6 h, with 6% retained in the body after 7 days. According to the manufacturer’s brochure, in humans, the Mn2+ content of Mangafodipir is eliminated 15% via the urine in 24 h and 59% in the feces in 5 days.

Oral Manganese MR Contrast Agent: CMC-001

The oral formulation of manganese based MR contrast agent, CMC-001, is a mixture of manganese chloride (MnCl2), alanine (C3H7O2N) and Vitamin D3 (C27H44O) (Fig. 3) [7, 9].

Fig. (3)

Chemical structures of MnCl2, alanine and vitamin D3, formulated as oral manganese based MR contrast agent currently under clinical trial as CMC-001.

Addition of alanine and Vitamin D3 to Mn2+ increase its uptake in absence of competing ions like Ca2+ and Fe2+. Absorption of manganese also decreases when the diet is rich in phylates and phosphorus. This is most likely the result of lower solubility of manganese with increasing concentrations of these compounds in the intestines.

Manganese absorption is mediated by a high affinity, low capacity and saturable active transport mechanism. In patients with iron deficiency or hepatic cirrhosis, manganese absorption is twice that in normal adults. This is likely due to higher concentrations of proteins that participate in the carrier mediated transport of both iron and manganese. The majority of absorbed manganese binds to α2-macroglobulin in the portal circulation. Both free and bound manganese are taken up by the liver, and then rapidly excreted into the bile. Vitamin D3 primarily affects the intestinal absorption of manganese.

The higher uptake of oral manganese over the bowel wall is due to the use of promoters. Secondarily, the uptake of manganese in the hepatocytes increases. During the first passage through the liver approximately 95% of oral manganese is taken up by the liver leaving only trace amounts in liver veins. For instance, Chabanova et al. [7] did not observe any increased levels of manganese in peripheral blood in healthy volunteers 25 h after intake of CMC-001 (Fig. 4). This is also confirmed by the lack of any pancreas and kidney MR enhancement after administration of the i.v. formulation.

Fig. (4)

Whole blood manganese levels before and after oral manganese in healthy volunteers (n = 12). The full dose corresponds to 1.6 g manganese chloride tetrahydrate, 1 g alanine and 1600 IU vitamin D3.

Recommended Dosage and Administration of Manganese MR Contrast Agents

Mangafodipir is available in two preparations— one at a concentration of 0.05 mol/l for a 1–2 min injection (in the US), and one with a concentration of 0.01 mol/l for 10–15 min infusion (in Europe). But the actual Mn dose used for the two preparations is equal, 5 μmol/kg body weight (b.w.). During the infusion it is necessary to observe the patient for adverse effects.

The recommended dose for the oral CMC-001 is much higher than that of Mangafodipir, but it is still modest— only 10 fold higher than the average daily intake in man (10 µmol/kg). However, the intake may vary considerably depending on the type of food ingested. A diet consisting of nuts, cereals, legume seeds, tea and coffee can provide 360–450 µmol/kg Mn on dry weight basis, whereas fish, cheese and poultry provide only 9 µmol/kg. CMC-001 can be administered at home at least 2 h before MR examination.

When a lesion with no uptake of Mn2+ has been identified, it is possible to characterize the lesion with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) using an extracellular gadolinium based contrast agent.

Manganese ion has 5 unpaired electrons, and is the second most powerful positive contrast agent for MRI after gadolinium. The effect of manganese in shortening the T1 and T2 relaxation times is dependent on its dose [9].

The use of manganese based MR contrast agent for abdominal MR imaging may have several advantages. First, the signal intensity of the normal liver increases on T1w images as manganese is taken up by the hepatocytes. Second, the signal intensity of gallbladder and of biliary tree also increases on T1w images due to manganese excretion into the biliary system. In addition the oral manganese formulation increases the signal intensity of the bowel lumen.

Abdominal MRI with manganese based contrast agent is typically performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner using a “breath-hold” scanning protocol [16-19]. The pre-contrast part of the protocol includes acquisition of high spatial resolution T1w gradient-recalled echo (GRE) images with thin slices. The post-contrast images are usually obtained 10–60 min after the end of administration of Mangafodipir, or 2 h after drinking the oral CMC-001. The post-contrast MRI includes the same T1w sequence for detection of liver lesions. For observation of the biliary system a high resolution 3D GRE sequence is also added.

In patients with diseases such as colorectal cancer, a routine workup of the liver pre-contrast imaging is often unnecessary for saving room time. For instance, Mangafodipir can be infused in a different room, or sachets of oral CMC-001 can be sent to the patient and ask them to drink the contrast medium when they wake up in the morning before going for examination. The imaging can then be done upon room availability within the next few hours.

If no lesions or no new lesions are observed, the procedure can stop. If a new lesion appears, one can obtain repetitive thin slices covering the lesion of interest after injection of a Gd based contrast agent in order to characterize the lesion by its dynamic contrast uptake. This strategy is the opposite of what is suggested for other liver specific agents in which the contrast uptake is done first. The strategy suggested here saves room time and guarantees that the lesion of interest is included in the field of view. Most MR scanners cannot cover a complete liver with thin slices for a contrast uptake study. Thus the lesion of interest may not be included, as its presence is not known.


Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Manganese MR Contrast Agent

Mangafodipir, manganese–dipyridoxyl diphosphate chelate (MnDPDP) is metabolized via transmetallation with zinc into the corresponding metabolites, as listed below and is shown in Fig. (5).

Fig. (5)

In vivo metabolism (transmetallation) of MnDPDP following administration of Mn based contrast agents. Mn-DPMP: Manganese dipyridoxyl monophosphate; Mn-PLED: Manganese dipyridoxyl ethylenediamine diacetate; ZnDPDP: Zinc dipyridoxyl diphosphate; ZnDPMP: Zinc dipyridoxyl monophosphate; Zn-PLED: Zinc dipyridoxyl ethylenediamine diacetate.

After bolus injection, Mn-DPDP reaches the highest average plasma concentration in less than 2 min, and is then rapidly eliminated to low levels within 15 min (Fig. 6). Mn-PLED reaches a peak plasma concentration at 10 min and is eliminated after 2 h. Zn-PLED concentration in plasma increases slowly to its peak of after 30 min, and is still detectable after 12 h as the only metabolite.

Fig. (6)

Plasma concentration of MnDPDP (Ũ) and its main metabolites after a bolus injection (<1 min) in volunteers receiving 10 μmol MnDPDP/kg bw. Values are means for 5 volunteers, error bars represent SD (adapted from [20]). MnDPMP (∆), MnPLED (š), ZnDPDP (■), ZnDPMP (▲), ZnPLED (●)

Following a 20 min infusion, Mn-DPDP is not detectable in plasma already at 2 min after the end of infusion, while Zn-PLED reaches a peak plasma concentration of 9 ±2 μ M between 10–30 min after the end of infusion. As with the bolus injection, Zn-PLED is the only detectable metabolite in plasma after 8 h.

The maximal plasma concentration of Mn for a dose of 5 μmol/kg b.w. after administration of MnDPDP is 38 μmol/l for bolus injection, and 14 μmol/l for a 20 min infusion; the corresponding dose for the ligand DPDP, is 38 and 26 μmol/l, respectively. The corresponding distribution volumes are 1–1.5 l/kg for Mn, and 0.24–0.28 l/kg for the ligand. The initial plasma half lives are below 20 min for Mn, and 50 min for the ligand and plasma clearance is 0.44–0.57 l/h kg, depending on the administration form. The Mn2+ fraction of the excretion is irrespective of the administration form, bolus or infusion— approximately 15% is excreted in the urine within the first 24 h, and 57–61% in feces over 4 days. Most of the ligand is excreted solely in the urine during 24 h [20].

Pharmacokinetics of Oral Manganese MR Contrast Agent

Following oral administration of MnCl2, Mn2+ is taken up from the gastrointestinal tract, and introduced into the portal system. Mn2+ is strongly absorbed during the first passage, leading to high gastrointestinal uptake, thus exposing the bowel and the liver to high doses of manganese and avoiding all other organs. The level of Mn2+ in the hepatic artery is within normal range, but it is higher than normal in the portal vein. This difference is observed only in oral administration, and its diagnostic value is still unknown. This active uptake of oral manganese is essentially the same as those of calcium, iron and zinc, and the uptake of manganese and calcium can be increased by the use of promoters such as vitamin D3 and various amino acids. In the phase 1 trial of the oral MnCl2, Mn2+ concentration in blood samples was at the same level as the placebo group, and no increased signals intensity of the liver was observed in patients with normal biliary excretion 24 h after administration [7].

Safety of Manganese MR Contrast Agents

Manganese is among the least toxic of the trace elements in mammals and birds [1, 21]. Excess body manganese in humans working in manganese mines or plants has been observed as an occupational disease [1, 22, 23]. Mn2+ may also accumulate, with deleterious effects, in the body of patients receiving parenteral nutrition over a long period. The principal organ affected by chronic manganese toxicity is the brain, probably because of its slower turnover of the element relative to other tissues. The neuronal injury is associated with degeneration in the striatum and globus pallidus (Fig. 7) [24]; the clinical symptoms are similar to those of Parkinson’s disease.

Fig. (7)

T1w image of a female brain receiving total parenteral nutrition for 3 years. Increased signal intensity is observed in the globus pallidus as a result of manganese deposit (adapted from [24]).

Safety of Manganese Intravenous MR Contrast Agent

Adverse events observed in clinical trials of Mangafodipir trisodium include feeling of warmth and flushing, nausea, pounding heart and dizziness. The first large scale trials conducted with this agent was reported in 1991 [25]. It was a phase 2 trial involving 141 patients, 38 (27%) of whom exhibited minor side effects. Flushing and feeling of warmth were reported in 21 (14%), and nausea in 3 (2.1%) [25].

Aicher et al. also reported side effects in 6/20 (30%) patients, including flushing, warmth and/or metallic taste [26].

A small European phase 3 trial that included 82 patients also produced mild or moderate adverse events in 17% of patients, and infusion related discomfort in 4% [27]. The rate of adverse events observed in a larger European phase 3 clinical trials was 7 % in 624 patients [8], as listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Incidence of Discomfort and Adverse Events of MnDPDP in a European Phase 3 Trial (n = 624) (Adapted from [8])

The largest study of efficacy and safety reported so far is a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial that included 404 adult patients in 18 institutions in the United States [13]. In this study 23% of patients reported experiencing at least one adverse reaction and a total of 146 adverse events were reported.

The most frequent adverse reactions associated with the administration of Mangafodipir trisodium are nausea, headache and pruritus. Sensations of heat and flushing are most common with high injection rates, and are probably related to peripheral vasodilatation. However, facial flushing is not significantly higher in slow bolus injection lasting 2–2½ min than that of infusion lasting 10–20 min. Transient decrease in alkaline phosphatase levels with the use of Mangafodipir trisodium have also been reported [13].

The exact mechanism of these adverse events to Mangafodipir trisodium is not known, but may be due, at last partly, to in vivo dechelation of Mn2+, with rapid incorporation of manganese ion into hepatocytes. After dechelation, manganese ion binds to serum proteins. Cardiovascular effects may also be seen due to increased circulating concentrations of manganese. Mn2+ given intravenously interferes with myocardial processing of Ca2+, and can act as a Ca2+ blocker, thus affecting cardiac contractility and muscle physiology. Manganese also uncouples myocardial and smooth muscle excitation and contraction, leading to further decrease in cardiac contractility and hypotension. In the brain, too, manganese may interfere with the electrochemical potential of cell membranes. Hyperacute toxicity is mainly the result of cardiovascular effects. Animal studies have shown [28-30] that the acute toxicity of intravenously administered manganese is due to cardiovascular effects caused by interference of Mn2+ with myocardial processing of Ca2+.

Safety of Manganese Oral MR Contrast Agent

Clinical experience with oral Mn contrast agent CMC-001 is at present limited. Adverse reactions have not been seen so far, but patients may experience discomfort due to a 400 ml large volumeintake [7] As CMC-001 is formulated with only nutritional products, it can be administered outside the imaging facility, e.g. in small clinics or at home. Oral administration of an excessive dose of manganese to rats (3600 µmol/kg, i.e. about 36 times the amount used in CMC-001), increases the billiary excretion of manganese, leading to its tissue retention. On the other hand, 1800 µmol/kg given daily for 3 months does not result in significant tissue accumulation [31]. One healthy volunteer has ingested approximately 200 µmol/kg daily for one month without feeling any adverse reactions [32].


The toxic effect of manganese is on the cardiovascular system because the inhibition of calcium entry interferes with electrical conductivity. In rats, for instance, repeated doses of excessive manganese (1.8 mmol/kg) given every other day for 3 months caused very small manganese accumulation in organs [31]. It was shown that acute toxic effects of manganese in organs might be avoided by using oral manganese administration instead of intravenous injection [33] Kreft et al. have reported liver contrast enhancement with oral dose of 1000 μmol/kg MnCl2 in rats, similar to that of an i.v. dose of 20 µmol/kg [33]. Thomsen et al. did not find any increased concentration of manganese in the liver of rats receiving 100 µmol/kg pure MnCl2 [15].

Infusion of up to 300 µmol/kg Mn-DPDP in conscious dogs caused no significant cardiovascular side effects, whereas a bolus injection of 100 µmol/kg increased the blood pressure moderately [34]. In dogs with ischemic heart failure an infusion of 300 µmol/kg MnDPDP caused minor hemodynamic and eletrophysiological effects, with no further deterioration in cardiac function [34]. Teratogenic effects have also been observed in pregnant rats, resulting in Mn induced skeletal malformations in the fetus [35]. Similar studies have been performed on rabbits with no observed malformations [36].

Approximate dose of MnCl2 at which 50% mortality occurred for mice, dogs and rats are shown in Table 2 [37].

Table 2

Median Lethal dose (LD50) of MnCl2 After Intrave-nous Injection (Adapted from [37])

In comparison with MnCl2, MnDPDP was shown to have a much better safety profile suitable as an hepatobiliary MR contrast agent for i.v. administration [38].

Southon et al. compared the efficacy of MnDPDP as a tissue-specific MR agent with that of MnCl2 in rats and pigs [39]. No loss of the efficacy was observed at the intended clinical dose of 5 μmol/kg. Both MnDPDP and MnCl2 showed dose dependent R1 relaxation rates, but no R2 changes were observed on T2w images. The highest R1 was observed for the liver, reflecting Mn2+ accumulation in this organ. The signal intensity enhancement peak was reached within 10–20 min irrespective of administration form, bolus or infusion. Doubling the dose from 10 to 20 μmol/kg, the signal intensity increased, but the difference was only moderate [39].


In a European phase 3 trials, Mangafodipir-enhanced images showed more lesions than contrast enhanced CT in 31% of cases, and fewer lesions in 13% of cases [8, 25]. In another phase 3 trials in the US, Mangafodipir-enhanced MRI was comparable or superior to CT [27]. Also according to Bartolozzi Mangafodipir-enhanced MRI showed more lesions than unenhanced MRI in up to 36% of patients [40]. In later studies also contrast enhanced MRI was equivalent or superior to helical CT in lesion detection [41, 42].

Sahani et al. has also reported that in patients with colon and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, high partial-spatial resolution Mangafodipir enhanced liver MRI reveals significantly more and smaller liver metastases than does the 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and positron emissiontomography (FDG PET) [43]. Similarly, improved lesion detection compared to CT and unenhanced MRI has also been reported by others [16, 40]. Thus, Mangafodipir enhanced MRI is likely to influence patient management in surgical candidates with liver tumors by detecting small metastases not detectable by CT and PET.

Cirrhosis may cause heterogeneity in Mangafodipir MRI enhancement, and fibrosis may account for low enhancement. However, a meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of Mangafodipir in patients with liver lesions and cirrhosis showed that significantly higher numbers of lesions were found on post-contrast images than in pre-contrast images, in both cirrhotic group (n = 137 patients) and non-cirrhotic group (n = 480 patients), and the higher detection was not influenced by liver cirrhosis. Mangafodipir also significantly improved lesion characterization in cirrhotic patients, but not in non-cirrhotic patients [44].

Fig. (8) shows hepatic dysfunction as a result of changes in portal flow due to tumor compression of the vessels, or early focal cirrhosis due to chemotherapy or diffuse lesions. The oral Mn formulation is especially suitable for detection of corresponding pseudolesions as it is delivered into the liver solely by the portal vein. However, the relationship between biliary and portal obstruction, either partial or total, with liver enhancement needs further evaluation, and the difference between arterial and portal doses may result in important diagnostic information. Theoretically, patients with partial portal thrombosis and abnormal venous contribution to the liver may have lower liver enhancements.

Fig. (8)

T1w MRI of liver before (A) and 2 h after (B) ingestion of CMC-001. Biliary obstruction caused by a choleangiocarcinoma (large arrow). The pseudo lesions (small arrows) are probably caused by tumor compression of the vessels.

The oral Mn formulation may also provide significant information in liver cirrhosis with reduced functioning hepatocytes and portal hypertension, sometimes with hepatofugal flows.

MR cholangiography for visualization of the bile ducts is based on the excretion of Mn into the bile vessels. Because T1w 3D GRE sequences can be performed in higher in-plane resolutions than T2w sequences, the intrahepatic bile ducts can be mapped, thus helping to find anatomical variants before surgery and evaluation of complex biliary–enteric anastomoses. Other structures, nonmetallic biliary stents and filling defects can also be delineated, as seen in Fig. (9) where the biliary system is visualized due to Mn excretion through the bile [45].

Fig. (9)

T1w MRI of liver obtained following oral intake of CMC- 001. Maximum intensity projection of internal biliary tree shows excretion of manganese through the bile. The ribbed appearance of the common bile duct (arrow) is caused by an endoprothesis.

Intravenous administration of Mn based contrast agent leads to enhancement of pancreatic tumors to a lower degree than normal pancreatic tissue, and thereby provides negative contrast visualization [46]. Although the detection rate of focal areas is increased (Fig.10), differentiation between benign and malignant lesionsis not possible on signal enhancement patterns alone. Thus a combination of both T2w and unenhanced images must be used for the fine differentiation of focal areas.

Fig. (10)

T1w MRI of liver and pancreas before (A), and T1w fatsat MRI after (B) administration of Mangafodipir. Both normal liver and pancreas tissue are enhanced after injection of manganese, with better delineation of focal lesions in both liver and pancreas (arrows). Images courtesy of Dr Dushyant Sahani, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.


Manganese is an essential trace element and a paramagnetic ion. Manganese based positive contrast agents may be administered both intravenously and orally. The two administration routes lead to different biodistribution patterns— in i.v. injection all organs are exposed, but in oral administration only the enterohepatic circulation is involved. Clinically Mn2+ is excellent in detection of focal liver lesions due to its uptake in mitochondria rich hepatocytes, and also for biliary delineation due to its biliary excretion, thus providing useful information on diffuse liver lesions. The i.v. formulation can be used for imaging focal pancreatic lesions. In comparison with CT and PET scans, Mn enhanced MRI reveals more and smaller metastasis in the liver, thus leading to a more correct staging of cancer patients.

Manganese based MR contrast agents are in general well tolerated with few mild adverse events. Both oral and i.v. formulations can be given outside the scanner room in order to save scanner time and the oral formulation can also be sent to the patient in advance to save hospital time for both patient and staff. However, as yet there are no reported studies comparing Mn contrast agents for detection of pathology with those of gadolinium and liver specific iron oxide contrast agents.

Manganese agents are also used for experimental studies of, for example, cardiac ischemia and olfactory system neural connection, though the clinical value of these remains to be demonstrated.


Thomsen HS. Manganese-containing magnetic resonance contrast agent. US patent no. 6,015,545/ 18 January 2000.


Mn2+  =  Manganese
Gd3+  =  Gadolinium
Cu2+  =  Copper
Zn2+  =  Zinc
MR  =  Magnetic Resonance
CT  =  Computed tomography
MnCl  =  Manganese chloride
DPDP  =  Dipyridoxyl diphosphate
DPMP  =  Dipyridoxyl monophosphate
PLED  =  Dipyridoxyl ethylenediamine-diacetate
DCE  =  Dynamic contrast enhancement
ALAT  =  Alanine aminotransferase
ASAT  =  Aspartate aminotransferase
GRE  =  Gradient recalled echo
T1w  =  T1 weighted
T2w  =  T2 weighted
i.v.  =  Intravenous
R1  =  Reciprocal of T1
R2  =  Reciprocal of T2
b.w.  =  Body weight


Track Your Manuscript:


"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."

Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."

Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."

Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."

Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."

Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."

Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."

Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."

J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."

Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."

Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."

Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."

Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."

Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."

M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."

Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."

Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."

Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."

Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."

Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."

Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)

Browse Contents

Webmaster Contact:
Copyright © 2021 Bentham Open