To better evaluate the renal safety profile of tenofovir, we performed a retrospective study of HIV-infected naïve patients starting a first antiretroviral therapy between July 2005 and July 2008, and followed-up for 24 months. On the whole, 324 patients were enrolled: 201 tenofovir-exposed patients were compared with 123 tenofovir-unexposed subjects. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, tenofovir-exposed subjects had a significantly greater decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and a significantly higher incidence of proximal tubular dysfunction through 24 months. Reduced glomerular and tubular functions were significantly associated with older age, diabetes, hypertension, and concomitant therapy with a HIV protease inhibitor.
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which
permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
* Address correspondence to this author at the Infectious Diseases, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 11, I-40138 Bologna, Italy; Tel: +39 051 6363355; Fax: +39 051 343500; E-mail:
Assessment of Kidney Safety Parameters Among Hiv-Infected Patients Starting a Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy
A growing number of case reports and cohort studies have described an association between treatment with tenofovir and renal tubulopathy or impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [1-3]. Alterations on tenofovir secretion by proximal renal tubule may lead directly to a greater drug accumulation in the renal tubular cells and, consequently, to a tubular damage and renal toxicity [4, 5].
We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of HIV-1-infected adult patients naïve to antiretroviral therapy and initiating a first antiretroviral treatment in our Division of Infectious Diseases from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients starting a tenofovir-containing regimen were compared with those starting a tenofovir-sparing regimen and all enrolled subjects were followed-up for 24 months.
Patients were excluded if they had a prior diagnosis of renal disease or dialysis, any change in current antiretroviral regimen, or no follow-up clinical or laboratory data for at least 24 months.
We recorded following demographic, clinical, and laboratory data at the start of therapy and at 3-month intervals during the 24-month follow-up: sex, age, race, arterial pressure, clinical manifestations of renal disease, plasma HIV RNA, CD4 lymphocyte count, serum creatinine, serum uric acid, serum phosphate, serum potassium, evidence of proteinuria, and evidence of glucosuria in the presence of normal serum glucose (<120 mg/dL).
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula , adjusted for body surface area, as usual.
Proximal tubular dysfunction was diagnosed with two or more of the following abnormalities: proteinuria (defined as ≥1+ or ≥30 mg% on urine dipstick), glucosuria (defined as ≥1+ or ≥30 mg% on urine dipstick), in the presence of normal serum glucose, hypouricemia (<2 mg/dL), hypophosphatemia (<2.7 mg/dL), and hypokalemia (<3.5 mEq/L).
We report multivariate hazard ratios (HR, Cox modeling) and linear outcomes (repeated measures) with predictors retained if P <0.10 (backward selection).
We analyzed continuous outcomes of changes in GFR, serum creatinine, and CD4 cell count through repeated measures linear mixed models. We employed Cox proportional hazard modeling for dichotomous outcomes of GFR 50% or higher decline, development of proximal tubular dysfunction, and achieving plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL.
Potential predictor variables included in multivariate models were age, gender, Black race, baseline creatinine, baseline CD4 lymphocyte count, antiretroviral regimen, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, malignancies, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), chronic hepatitis B and C, current use of diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
Three hundred twenty-four patients started a first antiretroviral treatment during the study period and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these 324 enrolled patients, 201 (62%) initiated tenofovir-containing regimens and 123 (38%) initiated tenofovir-sparing regimens.
Baseline demographic, epidemiological, and laboratory features were comparable in both groups, but the tenofovir-exposed group showed a greater prevalence of injection drug abuse and chronic hepatitis B (Table 1).
Baseline Demographic, Epidemiological, and Laboratory Features of the 324 Patients Included in our Study
Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference between tenofovir-exposed and tenofovir-sparing groups in percentage of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (77.5 vs 73.8%, respectively; P=0.18) and in change in CD4 lymphocyte count (+168 vs +189 cells/µl, respectively; P=0.21) at the end of follow-up.
Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted modeling for renal-associated outcome parameters are summarized in Table 2. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis for mean variation in GFR from baseline, the tenofovir-exposed subjects had statistically significant greater declines in GFR through 24 months compared with the tenofovir-sparing patients, and this decline was more significant among tenofovir-exposed persons with a higher baseline GFR (>80 mL/min/1.73m2). The only statistically significant predictors (P<0.05) of greater than 50% decline in GFR or as a continuous outcome measure were increased age (>50 years), diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, chronic hepatitis C, and inclusion of a protease inhibitor (PI) in the antiretroviral regimen. Increases in serum creatinine were also significantly greater among tenofovir-exposed patients compared with tenofovir-unexposed ones, and statistically significant predictors (P<0.05) of increased serum creatinine were higher age, diabetes, and lower CD4 count (< 200 cells/µL).
Unadjusted and Multivariable Adjusted Modeling for Parameters Associated with Renal Function, in the Studied Patient
A significantly higher percentage of tenofovir-exposed subjects did meet criteria for proximal tubular dysfunction at the end of 24-month follow-up compared with tenofovir-sparing ones (7.8% vs 1.3%, respectively; P<0.001). Particularly, the following components of the tubular damage definition showed a significantly greater incidence among tenofovir-exposed compared with tenofovir-unexposed patients: proteinuria (19.5% vs 10.2%, respectively; P=0.003), glucosuria (5.1% vs 0.7%, respectively; P<0.001), hypouricemia (2.1% vs 0.4%, respectively; P=0.021), and hypophosphatemia (7.8% vs 1.4%, respectively; P=0.009).
Statistically significant predictors (P<0.05) of development of proximal tubular dysfunction were higher age, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and a PI-based regimen. Numbers of treatment discontinuations were comparable between tenofovir-exposed and tenofovir-sparing patients (18.2% vs 16.5%, respectively; P=0.53).
Some observational studies have found evidence of a mild decrease in GFR in tenofovir-treated patients [7-10], but renal toxicity associated with this nucleotide analogue mostly occurs as tubular dysfunction, including Fanconi’s syndrome and acute tubular necrosis [2, 3].
Exposure to tenofovir was found to be associated with an increased risk of tubular abnormalities, as showed by the evaluation of plasma and urine markers of tubulopathy.
The incidence of glucosuria, proteinuria, hyperphosphaturia, hyperaminoaciduria, and an increased excretion of retinol-binding protein and beta-2 microglobulin, were significantly higher in tenofovir-treated subjects than in tenofovir-unexposed ones, and older age, PI-exposure, and comorbidities (mostly diabetes mellitus), acted as frequent clinical predictors of tenofovir-induced tubulopathy [7, 11, 12].
On the other hand, large observational studies and clinical trials have shown no evidence of glomerular or tubular damage when tenofovir is employed as a component of the initial antiretroviral regimen [13-15].
Moreover, it is well known that all conditions of acute and chronic kidney failure are frequently associated with an increased risk in drug-related renal toxicities. This last condition is expected to become more frequent and more relevant just in the population of patients living with HIV, which will be exposed to multiple pharmacotherapy in the next years , whilst the mean age of HIV-infected individuals is always on increase , and a premature ageing is typical of HIV-infected subjects themselves .
In our retrospective study, tenofovir exposure was found to be associated with a significant decline in GFR and mostly with a significantly higher risk of tubular damage, in line with previously reported observational studies. Decline in glomerular function was more evident in patients with baseline higher GFR, and significant predictors of glomerular or tubular damage were represented by a proportionally older age, underlying comorbidities (especially diabetes mellltus and hypertension), and HIV PI use.
In conclusion, tenofovir seems associated with a potential negative impact on kidney glomerule and proximal tubule function and structure in HIV-infected patients, but long-term consequences of these renal abnormalities are still unknown, and a periodic monitoring of renal function parameters in all patients taking tenofovir as a part of an antiretroviral therapy is strongly adviced.